You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Prevalence of feco-oral transmitted protozoan infections and associated factors among university students in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study

BMC Infectious Diseases201919:499

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4095-z

  • Received: 25 September 2018
  • Accepted: 15 May 2019
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

An estimated 60% of the world’s population is infected with one form of intestinal parasites. Amoebiasis and giardiasis are among the leading intestinal protozoan infections that affected mankind. However, literature that shows the magnitude of the problem among university students in Ethiopia is at scarce. Therefore, this study was aimed at assessing the prevalence of feco-oral transmitted protozoan infections and associated factors among sport festival participant universities in Ethiopia.

Methods

A cross-sectional study design was conducted among 483 randomly selected university sport festival participant students. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect the data. Stool specimens were examined using direct wet mount and formol-ether concentration techniques. The data were entered into Epi Info version 6.04 and were analyzed using SPSS version 20.0 statistical software. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was done to control the possible confounders and an odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval at p < 0.05 was used to identify an association between variables.

Result

The overall prevalence of intestinal protozoan infections was 140(28.9%) with the predominantly higher prevalence of E. histolytica/E. dispar 95(19.7%). The female respondents were at lower risk of infections compared to their male counterparts (AOR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.97]. Participants with educated father (AOR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.86) and those who received pocket money of > 347 Ethiopian Birr (~ 14 USD) per month (AOR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.74) were at lower risk of infections. However, being married (AOR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.10, 2.23), rural resident (AOR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.21, 3.32) and university stay for two or more years (AOR = 2.21, 95%CI: 1.48, 3.87) were more likely to be infected with protozoan infections.

Conclusion

The prevalence of intestinal protozoan infection among students who attend higher educational institutions was very high. Infection prevention strategies should be undertaken at respective universities with special focus to senior students and students from the rural area.

Keywords

  • Entamoeba histolytica/E. dispar
  • Giardia lamblia
  • Feco-oral
  • Protozoa
  • Students
  • University

Background

An estimated 60% of the world population is infected with intestinal parasites including amoebiasis and giardiasis [1, 2]. The incidence of the infections is 50% in developed countries as compared to the incidence rate of 95% in developing countries [2, 3]. The magnitude of intestinal parasitic infections is remarkably higher in tropical and subtropical regions including the sub-Saharan African countries where there are inadequate water supply and basic sanitation [4, 5]. The global burden of intestinal protozoan infections remained unacceptably high despite tremendous achievements in the prevention of communicable diseases. At present, there are approximately 50 million people living with Entamoeba histolytica worldwide, while another 3 million people are infected with Giardia lamblia [6].

Amoebiasis is an infection caused by Entamoeba histolytica, or E. histolytica, a protozoan parasite that causes intestinal or extra-intestinal disease [7]. Although it occurs worldwide, the prevalence of the infection is more common in the tropics and sub-tropics regions where there is poor sanitation [4, 8]. Invasive amoebiasis is commonly a disease of young people, and rare among children below five years of age [9]. Amoebiasis is the third common cause of death from parasitic diseases with greater health impact on people who are living in developing countries. Globally, it is estimated approximately 50 million people endure insidious amoebic infection each year, resulting in 40–100 thousand annual deaths [10].

Giardiasis is a protozoan infection and mainly affects the upper parts of the small intestine, usually affects children than adults [7, 11, 12]. Giardiasis constitutes a substantial proportion of the 2.5 million annual deaths from diarrheal diseases [13, 14]. In Ethiopia, giardia infections that occur during childhood can lead to protein-energy malnutrition and micronutrient deficiency which can be the cause of poor cognitive development and poor educational performance [8].

Like in other developing countries, there is a high prevalence of intestinal protozoan infections in Ethiopia, which could be due to a shortage of clean water, lack of sewage system and poor hygiene [15]. In addition to other common intestinal protozoan parasites, Giardia lamblia, E. histolytica, and cryptosporidium infections are very common in Ethiopia [16].

The magnitude of E. histolytica/E. dispar and G. lamblia were scarcely studied among university students in Ethiopia. However, a study conducted in Wollega University indicated that protozoan diseases remain the serious public health problems due to the low level of environmental sanitation and ignorance of simple health-promoting practices; Students’ hostels are usually unhygienic and unkempt resulting in a high population of flies. The causative agent of intestinal protozoa infections is often transmitted through unhygienic habits including the direct transfer of ova or cysts to mouth, eating with unwashed hands, consuming contaminated food, and poor sanitary conditions [17].

Several studies were conducted in different parts of the world to assess the prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections [12, 1720]. However, the majority of these studies were focused on preschool children and school children while there is a scarcity of evidence about the magnitude of intestinal protozoa infections among university students. Therefore, this study aimed at assessing the prevalence of feco-oral transmitted protozoan infections, specifically the prevalence and determinants of E. histolytica/E. dispar and G. lamblia, and associated factors among inter-university annual sports festival participant students. The finding of the study will be used by all public universities found in Ethiopian for planning infection control among universities.

Methods

Study design and setting

The cross-sectional study design was conducted among randomly selected higher education students who are attending the annual inter-university sport festival at Haramaya University in 2014. Haramaya University is one of Ethiopia’s eldest universities and its recognized nationally and internationally for excellence in teaching-learning, research and community engagement. It is located 550 km far away from the capital, Addis Ababa. The Ethiopian inter-university sport competition is an annually conducted festival where students from all public universities in the country come together for sport competitions at a selected hosting university. Haramaya University hosted the 7th Public Universities’ sport festival which was conducted from 8th -23rd of February, 2014 [21].

Sample size and sampling technique

The sample size was determined by a single population proportion formula, [n = (Z α/2)2 p (1-p) / d2] [22], by considering the following assumptions. In order to calculate the sample size the prevalence of intestinal protozoan infections 19.9% which is the finding of a study conducted among university students in Wollega University [17], 95% confidence level, 5% margin of error (d = 0.05), and a design effect of 2 were used.

Accordingly, 488 students who are attending higher educational institutions were randomly selected and were included in the study. Multistage sampling technique was employed to identify the universities, colleges, the departments and the study years of the students. The sample was proportionally allocated for all respective universities based on the number of students coming from each university by considering their study year, the colleges and the departments of the student. Finally, the study participants were identified from the list of students by using a simple random sampling method.

Data collection

The data were collected by using a pre-tested, structured and self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire was developed by reviewing different literature (see Additional file 1). The questionnaire was developed in the English language after completing a comprehensive literature review. Participants were instructed to complete the questionnaire in a separate room of the Haramaya University higher health center (HUHC) and the stool samples were collected from every participant. The completed questionnaires were recollected and were checked for completeness by an assigned health worker who is working in the health center. For stool investigation, four laboratory technology professionals were recruited and received relevant training on the standard operating procedures and the study objectives.

Approximately 2 g of fresh stool sample was collected using a small and labeled plastic container. The stool samples were then examined at the laboratory of HUHC by using direct wet mount and formol-ether concentration techniques [17, 23]. The direct wet mount technique was chosen because it is relatively cheap, simple, and reliable. In addition, the time required for the procedure was relatively short and requires no sophisticated equipment’s. The wet preparation by using normal saline and iodine solution was simultaneously performed to identify the presence of trophozoite and/or cyst forms.

Data processing and analysis

The data were entered into Epi-info Version 6.04 and exported to SPSS version 20 statistical packages for analysis. Frequency tables, proportions, a means, and standard deviations were used to describe the variables. An odds ratio was used to determine the presence of an association between explanatory variables and intestinal protozoan infections among the students. The degree of association between dependent and independent variables were assessed using an odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval and p-value < 0.05 was taken as a cutoff point to determine the presence of a statistically significant association. For adjustment, variables with p-value < 0.2 in bivariate analysis were taken to multivariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to measure the relative importance and to control for potential confounders that might affect the effect size and direction of the association between variable.

Variables

The prevalence of intestinal protozoan infections (represented feco-orally transmitted pathogenic intestinal protozoal infections), is the dependent variable for this study. The independent variables of the study include socio-demographic variables, place of growth, parental educational status, years of study, student’s pocket money, and field of study attended by the students.

Data quality management

The questionnaire was pre-tested and the feedbacks were used to make modifications to the questionnaires. Members of field staff (the data collectors and two supervisors; one microbiologist to supervise laboratory investigation) were selected based on their experiences of data collection. Before the commencement of the data collection, the data collectors and the supervisors were trained over two days on the objectives of the study, the methods of data collection, and the study tools. Field practice (pre-test) was undertaken to check the applicability of the questionnaire on 5% of the sample size among Haramaya University students who did not participate in the study. The data were checked for its completeness each day by the supervisors and the principal investigators. Laboratory procedures were conducted following the standard operating procedures.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents

From the total of 488 students participated in the study, 5 were excluded due to incomplete responses (making the response rate of 98.9%). The majority of the respondents, 77.8% were male with the mean age of 22 (ranged from 16 to 35) years. Almost all of the respondents, 94.4% were single whereas 65% of the respondents came from the rural areas. Regarding parental education, nearly half of the respondents (49.5%) have an uneducated father while the fathers of the remaining half had attended formal education (Table 1). The average received pocket money was 347 Ethiopian Birr (ETB) (~ 14 USD) per month. One hundred and seven (22.2%) of the respondents were year I (freshman) students and 8.9% of participants were from Haramaya University (Fig. 1).
Table 1

Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents (n = 483), Haramaya University, Ethiopia, 2014

Variables

Frequency

Percent

Sex

 Male

375

77.7

 Female

108

22.3

Ethnicity

 Amhara

188

38.9

 Oromo

138

28.6

 Tigrway

69

14.3

 Gurage

18

3.7

 Othersa

70

14.5

Religion

 Orthodox

294

61.0

 Protestant

100

20.7

 Muslim

66

13.6

 Catholic

15

3.0

 Othersb

8

1.7

Marital status

 Single

427

88.4

 Married

27

5.6

 In relationship

29

6.0

Residence

 Rural

314

65.1

 Urban

169

34.9

Paternal educational status

 Uneducated

238

49.5

 Educated

244

50.5

Year of study

 First year(freshmen)

107

22.2

 Second year and above(seniors)

376

77.8

Monthly received pocket money (ETB)

  ≤ 347

185

38.3

  > 347

298

61.7

Source of pocket money

 Family

395

81.8

 Other sourcesc

88

18.2

Field of study

 Natural science

398

82.4

 Social science

85

17.6

aSidama, Somali, Wolaita, Kembata, Harari, Hadeya, Silite, Afara, Sinasha

bWakefeta (Indigenous Beliefs) [5], Jehovas witness [3]

cRelatives, coast sharing payment (for non-café students), Pay (for students who were engaged in any income generating activities, charity organization (for students supported by charity organization)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Distributions feco-oral transmitted pathogenic Protozoal infections by university, Ethiopia 2014

Prevalence of intestinal protozoan infections

Based on the analysis of one formalin-fixed stool sample per a student, 140 (28.9%) of the respondents harbored at least one infection with an intestinal protozoa species. The prevalence of E. histolytica/E. dispar among the respondents was 95(19.7%); 71(14.7%) cyst stage and 24(5%) trophozoite stage. Similarly, 45(9.3%) of the students were positive for G. lamblia; 20(4.1%) cyst and 25 (5.2%) its trophozoite (Table 2). The magnitudes of infections were higher among males (19.5%) than females (9.4%).
Table 2

Result of stool examination for intestinal protozoa parasitic infections of participants (n = 483), Haramaya University, Ethiopia, 2014

Intestinal prtozoan infections

Infected, n (%)

Not infected, n (%)

E. histolytica /E. dispair

95(19.7)

338(80.3)

 Cyst

71(14.7)

412(85.3)

 Trophozoite

24(5.0)

459(95.0)

G. lamblia

45(9.3)

438(90.7)

 Cyst

20(4.1)

463(95.9)

 Trophozoite

25(5.1)

458(94.9)

Overall positive for Protozoa infections

140(28.9)

343(70.1)

 Cyst

91(18.8)

392(81.2)

 Trophozoite

49(10.1)

434(89.9)

Factors associated with protozoa infections

The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender, residence, paternal education, the study year, monthly income and marital status were significantly associated with protozoa infections. Female participants were less likely to be infected with protozoa infections compared to males (AOR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.97). Married students were more likely to have acquired protozoa infections than those who never married (AOR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.10, 2.23). Students who came from the rural areas were about 1.82 times more likely to be infected with protozoa infections as compared to those who came from the urban (AOR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.21, 3.32). Participants who attended year II and above were two times more likely to be infected as compared to year I (freshman) (AOR = 2.21, 95% CI: 1.48, 3.87). Students who have an educated father were less likely to have infections as compared to those who have uneducated fathers (AOR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.86). Study participants whose monthly received pocket money was > 347 ETB (~ 14 USD) were less likely to be infected with protozoa infections (AOR = 0.20, 95%CI:0.12, 0.74) (Table 3).
Table 3

Factors associated with protozoa infections among respondents, Haramaya University, Ethiopia 2014

Variables

Protozoa infections

COR (95%CI)

AOR (95%CI)

Positive

Negative

Sex

 Male

98

277

1

1

 Female

42

66

0.55(0.12,0.86)

0.48(0.22,0.97) *

Ethnicity

 Amhara

52

136

1

1

 Oromo

37

101

1.04(0.42,3.29)

1.21(0.34,3.17)

 Tigrway

18

51

1.08(0.30,2.65)

1.06(0.41,2.43)

 Gurage

9

9

0.38(0.14,1.81)

0.29(0.17,1.62)

 Others

24

46

0.73(0.22,1.86)

0.64(0.24,1.62)

Religion

 Orthodox

96

198

1

 

 Protestant

22

78

1.71(0.60,3.47)

1.56(0.48,3.18)

 Muslim

16

50

1.51(1.12,3.38)

1.45(0.93,2.87)

 Catholic

4

11

1.33(0.78,4.81)

1.42(0.65,4.72)

 Others

2

6

1.48(0.10,2.96)

1.39(0.45,3.24)

Marital status

 Single

134

322

1

1

 Married

6

21

1.45(1.11,3.54)

1.42(1.10,2.23) *

Residence

 Urban

64

105

1

 

 Rural

76

238

1.90(1.24,3.45)

1.82(1.21,3.32) *

Paternal educational status

 Uneducated

62

176

1

1

 Educated

78

166

0.75(0.32,0.94)

0.62(0.12,0.86) *

Year of study

 First year

48

59

1

 

 Second year and above

92

284

2.51(1.24,4.23)

2.21(1.48,3.87) *

Monthly received pocket money (ETB)

  ≤ 347

22

163

1

 

  > 347

118

180

0.20(0.10,0.76)

0.20(0.12,0.74) *

Source of pocket money

 Family

121

274

1

 

 Other sources

19

69

1.60(1.24,2.81)

1.52(0.18,2.64)

Field of study

 Natural science

113

285

1

 

 Social science

27

58

0.85(0.63,1.79)

 

*-indicates P-Value less than 0.05

Discussion

This study revealed that 140 (28.9%) of the students were infected with either E. histolytica/E. dispar or G. lamblia. Being a female, having an educated father and earning more than 347 ETB (~USD 14) were found to be protective against protozoan infections. However, being a single, coming from a rural area and being a senior student were found to be risk factors for protozoan infections.

The magnitude of E. histolytica/E. dispar or G. lamblia in the current study was higher compared to a previous study conducted in Ethiopia; Wollega University, 19.9% [17], Benishangul-Gumuz region, 26.6% [24], Nigeria; Michael Okpara University, 9.3% [25] and Akanu Ibiam Federal Polytechnic college, 21.2% [26], and Tanzania, 20.5% [27]. The reason for the high magnitude in this study may be attributed to poor personal hygiene due to a shortage of sanitary water supply in most parts of Ethiopia including universities [28, 29]. Moreover, poor food handling practices, consumption of contaminated food, poor sanitary conditions at the students’ cafeteria [17, 30], and poor hand washing practice of the students [31, 32] may have contributed to the higher prevalence.

The findings of our study indicated that E. histolytica/E. dispar was more prevalent 95(19.7) than G lamblia which is 40 (9.3%) among the students. Consistent with our study finding, studies conducted in the Gamo Gofa zone of southern Ethiopia [20] and in Saudi Arabia [33] revealed that more study participants were infected with E. histolytica/E. dispar than G. lamblia. This might be explained by poor personal hygiene among cafeteria workers and serving inadequately washed vegetables [30]. It may also be attributed to the nature of transmission of the infections and the infectiousness period [7].

In the current study, a higher magnitude of feco-orally transmitted protozoan infections was observed among male students as compared to their female counterparts. Similar findings that support our results were reported from the study conducted at Wollega University [17], where 12.6% male versus 7.4% female students were infected. The higher magnitude of infections among male is likely to be a reflection of different levels of hygienic behaviour between the genders [31]. Inversely, the inconsistent finding was reported from the Ebonyi state, Nigeria, where 36.0% of female versus 18.3% male were infected [25] and Tanzania, where 58.1% of females versus 42.3% of males [27]. The higher prevalence of infections among males than females may be attributed to that males usually consumes unwashed fruits and vegetables or uncooked salads which may be contaminated with the protozoan cysts [34, 35].

The current study revealed that students who come from a rural area were at an increased a risk for the protozoan infections. Similar findings were reported from the study conducted in Wollega university which identified students from rural areas acquire more infection than students from urban areas [17]. A consistent finding was also reported from the study conducted in Nigeria where rural dwellers were more prone to protozoan infections [19]. This might be explained by the difference in the lifestyles of urban and rural residents. Moreover, students from rural areas might be engaged in farming activities and usually use water from unprotected wells or rivers which are more likely to be contaminated [3, 36].

Limitations

This study may not indicate the causal relationship among variables because we employed a cross-sectional study design, which cannot establish a casual effect. The study included information about students who participated in the sport festival and may not be generalized to the general university students. The paucity of literature on the feco-oral transmitted protozoan infections among university students to compare our findings was another important limitation.

Conclusion

Prevalence of intestinal protozoan infection among students was very high. This high prevalence indicated that much work related to sanitation and hygiene has to be done to prevent intestinal protozoa infections and improve the health of the students. Universities should strengthen health promotions and educations on personal and environmental hygiene in order to improve sanitation for university students. Since protozoan infection can be acquired through feco-oral contact with contaminated food and drink, sanitation of students’ cafeteria, food handlers, the foodstuff, and the water should be taken into consideration to reduce food-and water-borne protozoan infections.

Abbreviations

AAU: 

Addis Ababa University

AOR: 

Adjusted odds ratio

CI: 

Confidence interval

COR: 

Crude odds ratio

ETB: 

Ethiopian birr

HU: 

Haramaya University

HUHC: 

Haramaya University Health Center

IHRERC: 

Institutional Health Research Ethics Review Committee

OR: 

Odds ratio

SD: 

Standard deviation

SPSS: 

Statistical package for social sciences

USD: 

United State dollar

WHO: 

World health organization

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The researchers would like to thank Haramaya University, for providing us with financial and administrative support. We would also like to thank representatives(supervisors) of all participated universities for their cooperation. Most importantly we would like to extend our appreciation to data collectors, supervisors and participants of the study. Last, but not least, the authors appreciate the contribution of Mr. Nima Yaghmaei for his supper contribution in grammar and language edition.

Funding

Haramaya University supported this work in covering the cost of field activities (data collection). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, interpretation of data, the decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

Conceived and designed the study: BH, AG, MR, and DA; adopted data collection instrument and acquisition of data: BH, AG, MR, and DA; Data management: BH, AG and DA. Analyzed the data and interpreted findings: BH, AG and DA; drafted the manuscript: BH, AG, MR, and DA; Critical revision and approval of the final manuscript: BH, AG, MR, and DA.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by Haramaya University Institutional Health Research Ethics Review Committee (IHRERC) and Ethical clearance letter was obtained. Official letter of co-operation was written to the representatives of respective universities. The objective of the study, the confidentiality, and the right to withdraw at any time without facing any consequences was explained to each participant at the time of recruitment. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant before any study enrollment. Students with any of the parasites and other acute health problems were linked to Haramaya University health center for treatment and cost of the treatments was covered.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Public Health, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia
(2)
Department of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia

References

  1. WHO. Prevention and Control of intestinal parasitic infections. Report of a WHO expert committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1987;749:1–86.Google Scholar
  2. Chacon-Cruz E. Intestinal Protozoal Diseases. eMedicine J. 2003;3(5):1–11.Google Scholar
  3. Romano Ngui SI, Chuen CS, Mahmud R, Lim YAL. Prevalence and risk factors of intestinal parasitism in rural and remote West Malaysia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(3):e974.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Haque R. Human intestinal parasites. J Health Popul Nutr. 2007;25(4):387–91.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Fletcher SM, Stark D, Ellis J. Prevalence of gastrointestinal pathogens in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Public Health in Africa. 2011;2(2):e30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Samuel LSJ, Reed SL. Microbes and microbial toxins: paradigms for MicrobialMucosal interactions. Entamoeba histolytica: parasite-host interactions. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001;280:1049–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Wright S. Amoebiasis and giardiasis. J Med. 2005;33(8):47–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Alemayehu M. Lecture notes on communicable disease control Addis Abeba the Carter Center, Ethiopia Ministry of Health, and Ethiopia ministry of education; 2004.Google Scholar
  9. VIC H. Communicable disease epidemiology and surveillance. Melbourne: Victoria Department of Health and Human Services; 2015.Google Scholar
  10. Jeevitha D, Pradeep PS, Kanchana M. Comparative Study of the Prevalence of Intestinal Parasites in Low Socioeconomic Areas from South Chennai, India. J Parasitol Res. 2014;630968. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/630968.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Choy SH, Al-Mekhlafi HM, Mahdy MAK, Nasr NN, Sulaiman M, Lim YAL, et al. Prevalence and associated risk factors of Giardia infection among indigenous communities in rural Malaysia. Sci Rep. 2014;4:6909.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Anim-Baidoo I, Narh CA, Oddei D, Brown CA, Enweronu-Laryea C, Bandoh B, et al. Giardia lamblia infections in children in Ghana. Pan Afr Med J. 2016;24:211–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Pires SM, Fischer-Walker CL, Lanata CF, Devleesschauwer B, Hall AJ, Kirk MD, et al. Aetiology-specific estimates of the global and regional incidence and mortality of Diarrhoeal diseases commonly transmitted through food. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0142927.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Younas M, Shah S, Talaat A. Frequency of Giardia lamblia infection in children with recurrent abdominal pain. JPMA J Pak Med Assoc. 2008;58(4):171–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Haileeyesus Adamu BP. Intestinal protozoan infections among HIV positive persons with and without antiretroviral treatment (ART) in selected ART centers in Adama, Afar and DireDawa, Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2009;23(2):133–40.Google Scholar
  16. Yemane B. Epidemiology of Health and Disease in Ethiopia. Uttar Pradesh, India: Shama Books Printing Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  17. Asegid A, Desalegn A. Prevalence of intestinal protozoan among students visiting Wollega University students’ clinic. Adv Med Biol Sci Res. 2015;3(1):36–42.Google Scholar
  18. Aschalew G, Belay A, Bethel N, Betrearon S, Atnad Y, Meseret A, et al. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections and risk factors among schoolchildren at the University of Gondar Community School, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(304). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-304.
  19. Bernard OA. INOaSEY. Prevalence of pathogenic protozoa infection in humans and their associated risk factors in Benue state, Nigeria. Int J Public Health Epidemiol. 2014;3(2):7–16.Google Scholar
  20. Teklu Wegayehu, Tsegaye Tsalla, Belete Seifu, and Takele Teklu. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections among highland and lowland dwellers in Gamo area, South Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(151). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-151.
  21. HU. Haramaya University: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia; 2014 Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haramaya_University.
  22. Dean AG, Sullivan KM, Soe MM. OpenEpi: Open Source Epidemiologic Statistics for Public Health, Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health.Version. 3.01, updated 2013/04/06. www.OpenEpi.com. Accessed 18 May 2019.
  23. Cheesbrough M. In: Technology TH, editor. District laboratory practice in tropical countries. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  24. Tigabu EPB, Endeshaw T. Prevalence of giardiasis and cryptosporidiosis among children in relation to water sources in selected village of Pawi special district in BenishangulGumuz region, northwestern Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2010;24:205–13.Google Scholar
  25. Ngele KK. The prevalence of intestinal protozoan parasites among the undergraduate students of Akanu Ibiam Federal Polytechnic, Unwana, Ebonyi state Nigeria. Int J Sci Nat. 2012;3(4):876–8.Google Scholar
  26. CCOaNB O. Intestinal parasites among undergraduate students of Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike Abia state, Nigeria. World Appl Sci J. 2013;25(8):1171–3.Google Scholar
  27. Mazigo HD, Ambrose EE, Zinga M, Bahemana E, Mnyone LL, Kweka EJ, Heukelbach J. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections among patients attending Bugando medical Centre in Mwanza, North-Western Tanzania: a retrospective study. Tanzan J Health Res. 2010;12(3).Google Scholar
  28. Seifu A, Amy S, Manyahleshal A. Water supply and sanitation in Amhara Region. In: Learning and Communication Research Report, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia; 2012.Google Scholar
  29. Ethiopia WA. Regional water supply and sanitation coverage in Ethiopia: according to 2001 EFY reports; 2010.Google Scholar
  30. Aklilu A, Kahase D, Dessalegn M, Tarekegn N, Gebremichael S, Zenebe S, et al. Prevalence of intestinal parasites, salmonella and shigella among apparently health food handlers of Addis Ababa University student’s cafeteria, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-014-0967-x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Simon Mariwah KH, Kasim A. The impact of gender and physical environment on the handwashing behaviour of university students in Ghana. Trop Med Int Health. 2012;17(4):447–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Marufa S,  Rashidul AM, Abdur RS, Sarder MH. Hand hygiene knowledge and practice among university students: evidence from private universities of Bangladesh. Dove Press. 2015;2016(9):13–20. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S98311.
  33. Zaglool DAKY, Gazzaz ZJ, Dhafar KO, Shaker HA, et al. Prevalence of intestinal parasites among patients of Al-Noor specialist hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Oman Med J. 2011;26:182–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Al-Rifaai JM, Al Haddad AM, Qasem JA. Personal hygiene among college students in Kuwait: a health promotion perspective. J Educ Health Promot. 2018;7:92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Prah J, Abdulai M, Lasim O, Ampofo-Asiama A. Assessment of hygiene Practices; 2018.Google Scholar
  36. Mainous AG, Kohrs FP. A comparison of health status between rural and urban adults. J Community Health. 1995;20(5):423–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Advertisement