You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Quantitative evaluation of an innovation contest to enhance a sexual health campaign in China

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Oct 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Ye Zhang
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Habip Gedik
24 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ruxandra V Moroti-Constantinescu
2 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ye Zhang
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ye Zhang
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
3 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lloyd Goldsamt
25 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ye Zhang
Resubmission - Version 5
25 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
20 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lloyd Goldsamt
19 Dec 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ye Zhang
Resubmission - Version 6
19 Dec 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 6
9 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Ye Zhang
Resubmission - Version 7
9 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
25 Jan 2019 Editorially accepted
4 Feb 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12879-019-3746-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement