You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Cheap and rapid in-house method for direct identification of positive blood cultures by MALDI-TOF MS technology

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Jan 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Maya Azrad
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Arnon Blum
2 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sharon Amit
17 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Maya Azrad
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Volkan Özenci
18 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tom R. Olma
3 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Maya Azrad
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
6 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Maya Azrad
Resubmission - Version 5
6 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
9 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Maya Azrad
Resubmission - Version 6
9 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
10 Jan 2019 Editorially accepted
18 Jan 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12879-019-3709-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement