You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

A retrospective study of factors associated with treatment decision for nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease in adults without altered systemic immunity

  • 1,
  • 2, 3, 4,
  • 5,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1, 4,
  • 1,
  • 2, 4,
  • 3, 4, 6,
  • 3, 4, 6,
  • 1 and
  • 2, 3, 4Email author
BMC Infectious Diseases201818:659

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3559-x

  • Received: 1 July 2018
  • Accepted: 26 November 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) lung diseases are increasingly recognized as chronic opportunistic infections, occurring in individuals with a wide variety of underlying conditions. In the absence of systemic immunodeficiency, decision of NTM lung disease treatment must relies on a careful risk/benefit assessment, given the requirement of long-term administration of multidrug therapies supported by limited evidence. The primary objective was to identify the factors associated with anti-NTM treatment initiation. Clinical and radiological outcome upon treatment were studied.

Methods

This retrospective, single center study (2013–2016, 45 months) addressed the criteria supporting treatment decision among adults with NTM lung disease without systemic immunodeficiency at our institution, with the assigned goal to harmonize the practice. All patients matched the current international definitions of NTM lung disease according to the American Thoracic Society criteria. Factors associated with anti-NTM treatment were investigated by conditional logistic regression. Clinical and radiological outcomes of treated and untreated NTM-disease cases were examined. Mortality rate was assessed. An expert radiologist conducted a blinded computed tomography (CT)-scan review of the treated and untreated patients.

Results

Among 51 cases of NTM lung diseases, 25 (49%) received anti-NTM treatment. In univariate analysis, a body mass index (BMI) < 18 kg/m2 (odds ratio (OR), 4.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2–15.2]; p = 0.042), hemoptysis (OR, 11.8 [95% CI 1.35–12.9]; p = 0.026), excavation(s) (OR, 4.8 [95% CI 1.4–16.4], p = 0.012), prior anti-NTM treatment (OR, 5.65 [95% CI 1.06–29.9]; p = 0.042), Aspergillus spp. co-infection (OR, 6.3 [95% CI 1.8–22.2]; p = 0.004) were associated with treatment initiation. In multivariate analysis, Aspergillus spp. co-infection was the only independent determinant of treatment initiation (OR, 5.3 [95% CI 1.1–25.4]; p = 0.036). Twenty-one (81%) patients received ≥3 anti-NTM drugs. Median treatment duration and follow-up were 36.3 (interquartile range [IQR], 13.1–64.4) weeks and 17.1 (IQR, 8.7–27.1) months, respectively. Regarding radiological outcome, 85 CT-scans were reviewed, showing similar rates of regression or stabilization in treated and untreated patients. Overall mortality rate was not different in treated and untreated patients.

Conclusion

The most relevant variable associated with anti-NTM treatment initiation was Aspergillus spp. co-infection. Radiological regression or stabilization of pulmonary lesions was not different between the treated and untreated patients.

Keywords

  • Aspergillus spp.
  • Bronchiectasis
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Hemoptysis
  • Mycobacteria
  • Mycobacterium avium complex
  • Nontuberculous mycobacteria

Background

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are ubiquitous bacteria of environmental origin including a widely diverse number of species (> 160), some of which cause disease in humans [13]. Prevalence of NTM lung diseases is unexpectedly increasing in industrialized countries, as consistently uncovered by recent studies [3, 4]. The key issue remains to determine whether NTM are the true and single promoter of an evolving lung disease or chronic airway colonizers, among others. To standardize the diagnosis of NTM lung disease, the guidelines for NTM diagnosis of the American Thoracic Society (ATS)/Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) and the British Thoracic Society (BTS) require isolation and growth of the same NTM strain on at least two separate samples from the patient [5, 6].

Human host and pathogenic NTM relationship is still poorly understood, as NTM virulence is highly variable from one species to another. NTM lung disease is strongly associated with pre-existing pulmonary conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cystic fibrosis, idiopathic bronchiectasis, prior active tuberculosis or pneumoconiosis [6]. It is also frequently associated with genetic or acquired systemic immune deficiency such as defects in the pathways of inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-12, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α or interferon (IFN)-γ, immunosuppressive treatments (including anti-TNF-α therapy or corticosteroids), solid-organ transplantation, or acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS)/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection [17]. However, it may also occur in individuals without recognized severe immune local or systemic deficiency. In the absence of patent predisposition, NTM diseases are overrepresented among the specific morphotype of slender women with a low body fat [8].

Treatment decision for NTM lung disease is challenging. There is debate as to which patients should benefit the most from treatment according to medical background, comorbidities, clinical status, radiologic features and causal NTM strain. Assessment of clinical, microbiologic, and radiologic response to treatment is not standardized as well. We focused on NTM lung diseases in adults without systemic immunodeficiency that met the ATS criteria guidelines. Based on the comparison of a group of treated and untreated patients, the primary objective was to identify the factors associated with physician decision of initiating anti-NTM treatment. Secondary objectives were to study the outcome upon treatment and to propose a standardized evaluation for the diagnosis and decision making to treatment of NTM lung diseases in adults without systemic immunodeficiency.

Methods

Study design and patient population

We conducted a retrospective, observational, single-center study between January 2013 and February 2016 (45 months) among adults (≥ 18 year-old) without systemic immunosuppression presenting NTM lung disease. Exclusion criteria were HIV infection, cystic fibrosis, primary ciliary dyskinesia, active malignant disease, solid-organ transplantation or ongoing immunosuppressant treatments such as TNF inhibitor or high-dose corticosteroid (≥ 1 mg/kg more than 21 days). Case identification was based on cross-referencing the databases of the mycobacteria laboratory and the departments of infectious and pulmonary diseases. Patients eligible for inclusion in the NTM lung disease cohort were those who matched the criteria previously defined by the ATS/IDSA and the BTS guidelines with the minimum requirement of clinical and microbiologic following criteria: (i) pulmonary symptoms associated with multifocal bronchiectasis with multiple small nodules on computed tomography (CT)-scan; (ii) proper exclusion of other diagnoses; (iii) NTM-positive culture results from at least two separate expectorated sputum samples or a NTM-positive culture result from at least one bronchial wash or lavage [5, 6]. Patients’ characteristics at diagnosis were collected in order to perform analysis on 146 selected variables: demographics; history of predisposing factors; underlying pulmonary diseases; comorbidities; pulmonary function testing; respiratory bacterial or mycological co-infection(s), which definition was similar to NTM criteria, namely positive culture isolation of the same species from at least two separate expectorated sputum samples or a positive culture result from at least one bronchial wash or lavage; immunologic status; nutritional status; clinical features; microbiologic assessment through identification of NTM species on positive NTM cultures and sample culture conversions; radiologic features on high-resolution CT-scans (fibrocavitary disease or nodular/bronchiectasis disease); prior treatment for NTM lung disease, treatment combination and duration; outcome. Because of the retrospective observational nature of the study and the lack of any modification in patients’ management, the need for informed consent was waived with the authorization of the Ethics Committee of Lyon University Hospital (Comité d’Ethique, Hospices Civils de Lyon), which approved the study under the number 17–207.

Radiologic assessment

An independent expert chest radiologist, blinded to the patient information, retrospectively reviewed the CT-scans performed without injection of intravenous contrast media, assigned in random order at diagnosis and six to 24 months after treatment or during the follow up of the untreated patients. The number and size of cavity(ies) and their wall thickness were evaluated in the lung window setting. Nodular opacity(ies) (≥ 10 mm), cluster(s) of small nodules (≤ 5 mm), the tree-in-bud pattern, the presence of bronchiectasis in any of the lobes or multifocal bronchiectasis were evaluated. Based on the number and size of the lesions, the expert classified the lesions as improved, stable or worsening.

Endpoints

The primary endpoint was to identify the factors significantly involved in the decision of initiating anti-NTM treatment by patient referent physician. Secondary endpoints were the assessment of clinical and radiological outcomes upon anti-NTM treatment in comparison with no treatment. Based on these findings, a standardized appraisal was proposed to assist diagnosis management and treatment decision for NTM lung diseases in adults without altered systemic immunity.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive data were used to estimate the frequencies of the study variables. There were expressed as count (percentage, %) for dichotomous variables and as medians (interquartile range [IQR]) for continuous values. The number of missing values was excluded from the denominator. Non-parametric statistical methods Fisher exact test, χ2 test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare groups, where appropriate. The probability of treatment initiation over time was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis, with group comparison using the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. Stepwise binary logistic regression analysis was used to assess the determinants for treatment initiation, expressed as odd ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). After checking the variables for interactions, variables with medical meaning and with p-values obtained in the univariate analysis of < 0.15 were included in the final multivariate model. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. All analyses were performed using SPSS software version 24.0 (SPSS. Chicago. IL).

Results

Out of 149 patients eligible to ATS/IDSA NTM lung disease criteria, 51 patients were included in the study, of who 25 (49%) received and 26 (51%) did not receive anti-NTM treatment (Fig. 1). The median age was 68 (interquartile range [IQR], 59–75) year-old with a male/female ratio of 0.76. Etiologic NTM agents were Mycobacterium avium (n = 17, 33.3%), M. chimaerae (n = 14, 27.5%), M. xenopii (n = 9, 17.6%), M. intracellulare (n = 9, 17.6%), M. simiae (n = 3, 5.9%), M. kansasii (n = 1, 2%), and M. abscessus (n = 1, 2%), with three patients having ≥2 concomitant NTM lung diseases. Importantly, the evidence of NTM lung disease has led to diagnose six underlying chronic lung diseases, of which a genetically documented cystic fibrosis in a 61 year-old women. On descriptive analysis, patient’s characteristics did not significantly differ, to the exception of a lower BMI (p = 0.023) and a higher number of previously known NTM lung disease (p = 0.038) in treated versus untreated patients (Table 1). Notable percentages of missing data at diagnosis have to be acknowledged for active tobacco smoking (64.7%, n = 33), respiratory functional testing (23.5%, n = 12) with a very few patients having a 6-min walk test, baseline arterial blood oxygenation levels (58.8%, n = 30), CT-scan follow up within 24 months after diagnosis in untreated patients (46%, n = 12).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Flow chart of adult patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease without altered systemic immunity included in the study. Nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease defined according to the American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America and the British Thoracic Society [4, 5]

Table 1

Patients’ demographic and baseline descriptive characteristics

 

Treated patients (n=25)

Untreated patients (n=26)

P-value

Age, median (IQR) years

65 (54-74)

70 (60.8-76)

0.227

Gender (male)

9 (36)

13 (50)

0.4

Active smokers

6 (24)

6 (23)

1

Cumulative tobacco smoking (IQR) pack/year

32.5 (28.8-52.5)

40 (21.3-60)

0.79

BMI (IQR) kg/m2

17.9 (16.8-19.9)

19.9 (18.3-23.8)

0.023

History of tuberculosis

6 (24)

5 (19.2)

0.74

History of NTM lung disease

8 (32)

2 (7.7)

0.038

History of croup during infancy

1

1

1

Gastroesophageal reflux disease

4 (16)

2 (7.7)

0.42

History of cured malignant solid tumor

1 (4)

5 (19.2)

0.19

Diabetes mellitus

0

2 (7.7)

0.49

Chronic heart failure

0

4 (16)

0.11

Asthma or atopic disease

6 (24)

2 (7.7)

0.14

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

4 (16)

9 (34.6)

0.19

Bronchiectasis

14 (56)

14 (53.8)

1

Chronic interstitial lung disease

2 (8)

5 (19.2)

0.42

Chronic rheumatic disease

6 (24)

2 (7.7)

0.14

Autoimmune disease

3 (12)

4 (15.4)

1

History of thoracic surgery

5 (20)

3 (11.5)

0.46

Corticosteroid inhaled therapy

6 (24)

7 (27)

1

NOTE Data are No. (%) of patients, unless otherwise indicated. Variables were compared using Mann–Whitney U test, χ2 test or the Fisher exact test, where appropriate

Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range

Factors leading the patient referent physician to initiate anti-NTM treatment were assessed using bivariate analysis. Among the factors significantly associated with treatment were the BMI < 18 kg/m2 (odds ratio (OR), 4.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2–15.2]; p = 0.042), prior anti-NTM treatment (OR, 5.65 [95% CI 1.06–29.9]; p = 0.042), hemoptysis (OR = 11.8 [95% CI 1.35–102.9]; p = 0.026), the presence of excavation(s) on lung CT-scan (OR, 4.8 [95% CI 1.4–16.4], p = 0.012), Aspergillus spp. co-infection (OR, 6.3 [95% CI 1.8–22.2]; p = 0.004) (Table 2). In multivariate analysis, Aspergillus spp. co-infection was the single independent factor associated with anti-NTM treatment (OR, 5.3 [95% CI 1.1–25.4]; p = 0.036) (Table 3).
Table 2

Bivariate analysis of the factors associated with treatment initiation in adult patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease without systemic immunodeficiency

Tested variables

Treated patients (n=25)

Untreated patients (n=26)

 

P-value

OR [95% CI]

Clinical criteria

 BMI < 18 (kg/m2)

13/24 (54.2)

5/23 (21.7)

 

0.026

4.25 [1.18-15.2]

 Weight loss > 5%

17 (68)

10 (38.5)

 

0.05

3.4 [1.07-10.77]

 fatigue

13 (52)

7 (27)

 

0.071

2.94 [0.9-9.46]

 chronic cough

16 (64)

14 (54)

 

0.572

1.52 [0.49-4.69]

 night sweats

5 (20)

3 (11.5)

 

0.465

1.92 [0.41-9.05]

 hemoptysis

8 (32)

1 (3.8)

 

0.026

11.8 [1.3-102.8]

Microbiological criteria

 AFB-positive sputum sample on direct examination

13 (52)

8 (30.8)

 

0.160

2.44 [0.77-7.65]

 NTM-positive culture NTM on lower respiratory tract sample

2 (1-2.3)

1 (1-1.8)

 

0.044

1.79 [1-3.2]

Functional criteria

 FEV1 (L)

1.6 (1.2-2.2)

1.9 (1.2-2.5)

 

0.554

0.72 [0.34-1.51]

Immunological and nutritional status

 total lymphocyte count (G/L)

1.3 (1.2-1.7)

1.4 (1.1-2.1)

 

0.388

0.95 [0.86-1.04]

 CD4+ lymphocyte count (%)

54 (4.5-61.5)

40 (37.8-44.3)

 

0.031

1.07 [0.95-1.21]

 serum albumin (mg/L)

39.5 (36-43)

39 (33-42.5)

 

0.481

1.05 [0.97-1.14]

 serum pre-albumin (mg/L)

0.21 (0.15-0.24)

0.22 (0.15-0.25)

 

0.974

1.25 [0-1.48]

 vitamin D deficiency

6/10 (60)

6/7 (86)

 

0.338

0.25 [0.02-2.95]

Co-infection(s)

Mycobacterium tuberculosis

1 (4)

1 (4)

 

0.35

1.04 [0.06-17.6]

Pseudomonas spp.

2 (8)

3 (11.5)

 

1

0.68 [0.1-4.4]

Aspergillus spp.

15 (60)

5 (19.2)

 

0.004

6.3 [1.8-22.2]

Radiologic features at diagnosis

 nodule(s) (≥ 10mm)

12 (48)

7/23 (30)

 

0.25

2.11 [0.65-6.9]

 cluster(s) of micronodules (< 5mm)

16 (64)

10/23 (44)

 

0.246

2.31 [0.72-7.4]

 cavitation(s)

18 (72)

8/23 (35)

 

0.019

4.82 [1.42-16.4]

 bronchiectasis

14 (56)

11/23 (48)

 

0.773

1.39 [0.45-4.3]

 emphysema

9 (36)

11/23 (48)

 

0.559

0.61 [0.19-1.95]

Radiologic review

 regression

8/23 (35)

4/13 (31)

 

1

1.2 [0.28-5.15]

 stabilization

9/23 (39)

6/13 (46)

 

0.736

0.75 [0.19-2.97]

 worsening

6/23 (26)

3/13 (23)

 

1

1.18 [0.24-5.8]

NOTE Data are No. (%) of patients, unless otherwise indicated. Denominators have been stipulated for variables with missing data. Odds ratios (OR) were determined by conditional logistic regression with 95% confidence interval (95% CI)

Abbreviations: AFB, acid-fast bacilli; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; NTM, nontuberculous mycobacteria; OR, odds ratio

Table 3

Multivariate analysis of factors associated with the initiation of anti-nontuberculous mycobacteria treatment

Independent variables

OR [95% CI]

P-value

Aspergillus spp.

5.33 [1.1-25.5]

0.036

weight loss > 5%

2.44 [0.6-10.2]

0.22

hemoptysis

3.2 [0.28-36.3]

0.35

excavation(s)

3.54 [0.83-15.1]

0.087

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio

The probability of treatment initiation over time according to the presence or not of targeted variables was investigated. The probability was significantly higher in case of BMI < 18 vs. > 18 kg/m2 (p = 0.006), of hemoptysis vs. no hemoptysis (p = 0.009), of Aspergillus spp. co-infection vs. no co-infection (p = 0.029), of pulmonary excavation(s) vs. no excavation (p = 0.005) (Fig. 2a, b, c and d, respectively). In the treated group, 21 (84%) received ≥3 anti-NTM drugs, among whom 23 (92%) received a macrolide as part of a first-line regimen. Median anti-NTM treatment duration was 36.3 (IQR, 13.1–64.4) weeks. Thirteen (52%) of the treated patients developed at least one antimicrobial-related adverse event, among which gastrointestinal disorders (n = 6), impaired blood cell count (n = 5) and cholestatic and/or cytolytic hepatitis (n = 4). According to physician judgment, clinical stabilization and improvement was obtained for 8 (34.8%) and 12 (52.2%) of treated patients, respectively. Patient’s median follow-up from diagnosis assessment was 17.1 (IQR, 8.7–27.1) months. Eighty-five CT-scans were reviewed for comparative assessment after treatment or over the course of follow-up in the untreated subset. The median interval between the initiation of NTM treatment and the date of the assessed images was 56.7 (IQR, 43.3–97.7) weeks. Although 34.8% (n = 8) and 39.1% (n = 9) experienced regression or stabilization of their pulmonary lesions in the treated patients, these rates did not differ from the untreated patients with 30.8% (n = 4) and 46.2% (n = 6) of regression and stabilization over the course of their follow-up, respectively (Table 2). Finally, all-cause mortality was not different between treated and untreated groups, although lost to follow-up was high in the untreated group (n = 10, 38.5%). Regarding the four patients that deceased (n = 3 in the treated group and n = 1 in the untreated group), the cause of mortality was linked to the underlying diseases rather than NTM-related mortality.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Overall probability of anti-nontuberculous mycobacteria treatment initiation according to the presence or the absence of the following variables: a body mass index < 18 kg/m2; b hemoptysis; c Aspergillus spp. co-infection; d lung excavation(s). Overall survival probabilities were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared by the log-rank test

Discussion

In the present study, treated patients were characterized by BMI < 18 kg/m2, presence of hemoptysis and excavation(s), Aspergillus spp. co-infection, and prior anti-NTM treatment. Aspergillus spp. co-infection was the only independent factor associated with treatment initiation. A single study from five English centers has recently addressed the factors that influence anti-NTM treatment initiation using similar retrospective design of treated and untreated cohort comparison (2010–2014), to the exception of different inclusion criteria which allowed non-AIDS/HIV immunosuppressed patients (36 and 33% in the treated and untreated subsets, respectively) to be evaluated. In the multivariate analysis, patients had increased odds of anti-NTM treatment in case of cavitation on CT imaging, night sweats and weight loss [9].

Here, three out of four criteria are part of guideline criteria leading to decision of anti-NTM treatment. They all reflect a degree of severity of NTM lung disease linked with progression of an impaired respiratory condition. The current problematic of NTM lung diseases shifts from distinguishing colonization from infection toward differentiating stable, poorly active vs. progressive active NTM disease, the latter being responsible for further structural lung damage(s). The risk/benefit analysis includes prescribing recommended long-term multidrug regimens with concerns over suboptimal cure rates and frequently reported drug-related side effects. To support these arguments, others have already shown that physician ATS/IDSA guideline adherence is moderate confirming such a trend of intuitive clinical behavior mostly based on evidence of severity and/or patent progression of the disease. A multicenter study has reported a sample of 349 US physicians treating 915 patients with M. avium complex (MAC) lung disease. Overall, 55% (n = 411) of patients with MAC lung disease received some type of anti-NTM treatment from their physician and 13% prescribed antibiotic regimens were consistent with ATS/IDSA guidelines [10]. Another study conducted in France has shown that among a cohort of 31 NTM lung diseases, only 12 (38.7%) received appropriate treatment matching ATS/IDSA guidelines [11]. Inappropriate prescriptions were mostly related to shorter treatment duration (6 months or less) and/or off-recommendation regimen, particularly those excluding macrolide from the combination or those using a single-drug macrolide regimen [10, 11]. It has to be acknowledged that guidelines specify that treatment for MAC-associated lung disease in HIV-negative individuals can be a three-times-weekly drug regimen upon culture conversion while on therapy for 1 year, which may favor treatment compliance [5, 12, 13].

Patients with bronchiectasis and NTM lung disease have a higher prevalence of being sensitized to Aspergillus than patients with NTM-free bronchiectasis [12]. Allergic airway manifestations in response to Aspergillus are termed Aspergillus-related lung diseases with a spectrum going from Aspergillus-induced hypersensitivity to the severe allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) [14]. By itself, the coexistence of NTM and Aspergillus in lung airway justifies the need for testing Aspergillus serology, total serum immunoglobulin (Ig)E and Aspergillus-specific IgE levels as well as mycological direct examination and culture of sputum or bronchial aspirates for presence of filamentous fungi in the diagnosis algorithm of patients with NTM lung diseases. Active co-infections with NTM and Aspergillus spp. have also been described, in which patients with NTM lung disease develop chronic forms of pulmonary aspergillosis which definitions and management have been revisited in recent updated guidelines [1417].

Radiographic improvement may be hampered by concomitant lung disease and the limited potential for resolution of consolidated radiologic abnormalities. A previous study has investigated radiologic response to treatment showing consistent results with those found in the present study. Although anti-NTM treatment led to an improvement or stabilization of lesions for a majority of patients, these modifications were not significantly different from the untreated group who went through CT-scan follow up indicating that anti-NTM treatment did not lead to radiological abnormalities reversion [9]. The present study has strengths and limitations. The strength is the study of the largest cohort so far of NTM lung diseases in patients without systemic immunodeficiency with exhaustive data collection and blinded radiological assessment. We acknowledge the biases that contribute to mitigate conclusions from the study such as being conducted in a single center, the important differences in physician’s management resulting in lack of consistency in treatment decision making, the number of missing data. In addition, the CT-scans were not performed at fixed intervals, particularly in the untreated subset of patients. Finally, treatment duration and outcome criteria were not standardized, which prevent to properly assess treatment efficacy. Useful consensus definitions for key outcome parameters to be used in the treatment of NTM lung diseases have been released very recently, which should harmonize data collection regarding NTM treatment [18].

Future researches are necessary to better define criteria associated with progressive active NTM disease in the immunocompetent setting. Concretely, this preliminary study has led to implement in our institution a standardized appraisal for the diagnosis of NTM lung diseases in this particular setting (Table 4). The aim is to provide a future basis for the development of a diagnosis scoring system supporting anti-NTM treatment decision. Future studies should focus as well on the most relevant CT imaging variables associated with response to treatment over time that may be applied in future clinical trials to assess treatment outcome.
Table 4

Standardized appraisal for patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial lung diseases without systemic immunodeficiency referred at our institution

 

Comments

Exhaustive history record

 infant respiratory diseases

croup, Influenza, measle

 gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

 

 atopic dermatitis

 

 eating disorders

anorexia, bulimia

 family history of respiratory disease

 

 prior tuberculosis

 

 prior anti-NTM treatment

 

Environmental exposure

 passive tobacco exposure

 

 active tobacco smocking

Packs-per-year

 other toxic/drug exposure

 

 chronic alcoholism

micro-inhalations

 habitat characteristics

domestic water system, allergens

Blood tests

 serum albumin

nutritional status

 serum pre-albumin

 vitamin D (25-OH D3)

 HIV serology

cellular immune defect

 T CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocyte counts

 total IgG serum level

hypogammaglobulinemia

 total eosinophil count

Aspergillus-related allergic lung diseases

 total IgE serum level

Aspergillus-specific IgE

Aspergillus serology

 galactomannan antigenemia

invasive aspergillosis

 Interferon-γ reactive assay

latent tuberculosis infection

Lung function testing

 spirometry including FEV1

lung volumes

 plethysmography

 pulse oxymetry

oxygen level

 arterial blood gas tests

 6-minutes walk test

stress test

Imagery

chest X-ray

 lung HRCT scan

Micronodules (≤ 5mm), nodules (≥ 10 mm), pulmonary consolidations, bronchiectasis, tree-in-bud images, cavity(ies)

Cytology and microbiologic tests on respiratory samples

BALF cytological composition

sputum/BALF direct examination

 sputum/BALF collection for bacterial culture

Non-fermenting gram-negative bacilli (Pseudomonas aeruginosa)

 sputum/BALF collection for mycological culture

filamentous fungi

 nasal swab/BALF collection for respiratory virus PCR screening

human Respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, metapneumovirus, rhinovirus, and coronavirus

Specific tests depending on the setting

 α-1 antitrypsin level

lung emphysema

 sweat test

cystic fibrosis

 CFTR gene screening

 airway cilia sample

primary ciliary dyskinesia

 IFN-γ and IL-12 plasma levels

host predisposition to NTM diseases

 blood anti-IFN-γ autoantibodies

 IFN-γ or IL-12 gene screening

Abbreviations: BALF, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; CFTR, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator, FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; HRCT, high-resolution computed tomography; IFN-γ, interferon gamma; Ig, immunoglobulins; IL, interleukin

Conclusions

In summary, the main factors supporting anti-NTM treatment decision in immunocompetent were low BMI, hemoptysis, lung excavation(s), prior anti-NTM treatment and Aspergillus pp. co-infection, the latter being the only independent factor. Anti-NTM treatment did not achieve radiological abnormalities reversion, as pulmonary lesions assessment showed no difference between the treated and the untreated patients. A diagnosis of NTM lung disease in an immunocompetent patient requires investigating the presence of a chronic pulmonary underlying disease.

Abbreviations

AIDS: 

Acquired immune deficiency syndrome

ATS: 

American thoracic society

BTS: 

British thoracic society

COPD: 

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

CT: 

Computed tomography

HIV: 

Human immunodeficiency virus

IDSA: 

Infectious disease society of America

IFN: 

Interferon

IL: 

Interleukin

NTM: 

Non tuberculous mycobacteria

TNF: 

Tumor necrosis factor

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Pr Gilles Devouassoux for helpful insights.

Funding

No external funding was received for this study.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

JP contributed to conception and design of the study, acquisition of the data, interpretation of the data, drafted the manuscript and approved the final version; FV carried out the statistical analysis, participated in revision of the paper for important intellectual content, and approved the final version; DG carried out the blinded review of 85 CT-scans with the examination of each imagery, she participated in revision of the paper for important intellectual content, and approved the final version; GL and OD are in charge of the Mycobacteria laboratory and have provided NTM strain identification and drug susceptibility tests. They participated in revision of the paper for important intellectual content, and approved the final version; SR, NF, EP, PJS, LKM, and CC contributed to acquisition of the data, revision of the paper for important intellectual content, and approved the final version; FA and AS are the project initiators, contributed to conception and design of the study, drafted the manuscript and approved the final version. FA coordinated the project until the submission of the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Ethics Committee of Lyon University Hospital (Comité d’Ethique, Hospices Civils de Lyon) approved the study under the number 17–207. Because of the retrospective observational nature of the study and the lack of any modification in patients’ management, the need for informed consent was waived with the authorization of the Ethics Committee of Lyon University Hospital (Comité d’Ethique, Hospices Civils de Lyon), which approved the study under the number 17–207.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Département de Pneumologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
(2)
Département des Maladies infectieuses et tropicales, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 103, Grande-Rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69317, cedex 04 Lyon, France
(3)
CIRI-Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Inserm, U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5308, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Univ Lyon, F-69007 Lyon, France
(4)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
(5)
Département de Radiologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
(6)
Institut des Agents Infectieux, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France

References

  1. Wassilew N, Hoffmann H, Andrejak C, Lange C. Pulmonary disease caused by non-tuberculous mycobacteria. Respiration. 2016;91:386–402.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Aksamit TR, Philley JV, Griffith DE. Nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease: the top ten essentials. Respir Med. 2014;108:417–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Raju RM, Raju SM, Zhao Y, Rubin EJ. Leveraging advances in tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment to address nontuberculous mycobacterial disease. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:365–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Winthrop KL, McNelley E, Kendall B, et al. Pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial disease prevalence and clinical features: an emerging public health disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182:977–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Griffith DE, Aksamit T, Brown-Elliott BA, Catanzaro A, Daley C, Gordin F, et al. An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175:367–416.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Haworth CS, Banks J, Capstick T, et al. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD). Thorax. 2017;72:ii1–ii64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Larsson LO, Polverino E, Hoefsloot W, Codecasa LR, Diel R, Jenkins SG, Loebinger MR. Pulmonary disease by nontuberculous mycobacteria-clinical management, unmet needs and future perspectives. Exp Rev Respir Med. 2017;11:977–89.Google Scholar
  8. Kartalija M, Ovrutsky AR, Bryan CL, et al. Patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease exhibit unique body and immune phenotypes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187:197–205.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Rawson TM, Abbara A, Kranzer K, et al. Factors which influence treatment initiation for pulmonary non-tuberculous mycobacterium infection in HIV negative patients; a multicentre observational study. Respir Med. 2016;120:101–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Adjemian J, Prevots DR, Gallagher J, Heap K, Gupta R, Griffith D. Lack of adherence to evidence-based treatment guidelines for nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11:9–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. El-Zeenni A, Chanoine S, Recule S, Stahl JP, Maurin M, Camara B. Are guidelines on the management of non-tuberculous mycobacteria lung infections respected and what are the consequences for patients? A French retrospective study from 2007 to 2014. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018;37:233–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Griffith DE, Brown BA, Cegielski P, Murphy DT, Wallace RJ Jr. Early results (at 6 months) with intermittent clarithromycin including regimens for lung disease due to Mycobacterium avium complex. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30:288–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Jeong BH, Jeon K, Park HY, et al. Intermittent antibiotic therapy for nodular bronchiectatic Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191:96–103.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kunst J, Wickremasinghe M, Wells A, Wilson R. Nontuberculous mycobacterial disease and Aspergillus-related lung disease in bronchiectasis. Eur Respir J. 2006;28:352–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Hafeez I, Muers MF, Murphy SA, Evans EG, Barton RC, McWhinney P. Non-tuberculous mycobacterial lung infection complicated by chronic necrotising pulmonary aspergillosis. Thorax. 2000;55:717–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kobashi Y, Fukuda M, Yoshida K, Miyashita N, Niki Y, Oka M. Chronic necrotizing pulmonary aspergillosis as a complication of pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex disease. Respirology. 2006;11:809–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Denning DW, Cadranel J, Beigelman-Aubry C, Ader F, Chakrabarti A, Blot S, Ullman A, Dimopoulos G, Lange C. Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis-rationale and clinical guidelines for diagnosis and management. Eur Resp J. 2016;47(1):45–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. van Ingen J, Aksamit T, Andrejak C, et al. Treatment outcome definitions in nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: an NTM-NET consensus statement. Eur Respir J. 2018;51:1800170.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement