You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Surgical outcomes of infectious spondylitis after vertebroplasty, and comparisons between pyogenic and tuberculosis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Jun 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Jul 2018 Author responded Author comments - Jen-Chung Liao
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Jul 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Jul 2018 Author responded Author comments - Jen-Chung Liao
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Jul 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hyoungmin Kim
15 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Heinrich Boehm
28 Sep 2018 Author responded Author comments - Jen-Chung Liao
Resubmission - Version 4
28 Sep 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hyoungmin Kim
21 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Heinrich Boehm
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
31 Oct 2018 Editorially accepted
12 Nov 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12879-018-3486-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement