You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A randomized trial to assess retention rates using mobile phone reminders versus physical contact tracing in a potential HIV vaccine efficacy population of fishing communities around Lake Victoria, Uganda

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Oct 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Noah Kiwanuka
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Noah Kiwanuka
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Larry Chang
24 May 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catherine M. Slack
19 Sep 2018 Author responded Author comments - Noah Kiwanuka
Resubmission - Version 4
19 Sep 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
7 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Larry Chang
18 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catherine M. Slack
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
31 Oct 2018 Editorially accepted
21 Nov 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12879-018-3475-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement