You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Summary results of the 2014-2015 DARPA Chikungunya challenge

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Apr 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
15 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Broniatowski
28 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ayako Sumi
14 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sara Del Valle
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alicia Mitchell
7 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pascal Meylan
10 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eric Lofgren
13 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anna Moniuszko
13 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Sara Del Valle
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alicia Mitchell
5 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pascal Meylan
16 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anna Moniuszko
16 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eric Lofgren
10 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Sara Del Valle
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
18 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Sara Del Valle
Resubmission - Version 5
18 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
27 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Sara Del Valle
Resubmission - Version 6
27 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
30 Apr 2018 Editorially accepted
30 May 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12879-018-3124-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement