You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Accuracy of different diagnostic tests for early, delayed and late prosthetic joint infection

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dominik Mertz
26 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Binu Dinesh
11 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Marta Fernandez-Sampedro
Resubmission - Version 2
11 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dominik Mertz
31 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Binu Dinesh
16 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Marta Fernandez-Sampedro
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
17 Aug 2017 Editorially accepted
25 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12879-017-2693-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement