You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: CXCL9, a promising biomarker in the diagnosis of chronic Q fever

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Apr 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
24 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gemechu Ameya
28 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Chan
29 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amin Talebi Bezmin Abadi
5 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Anne Jansen
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Chan
8 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amin Talebi Bezmin Abadi
14 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gemechu Ameya
28 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Anne Jansen
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
31 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
9 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12879-017-2656-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement