Hospitalization for community-acquired febrile urinary tract infection: validation and impact assessment of a clinical prediction rule
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|22 Jul 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Judith Strymish|
|10 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jan Verbakel|
|18 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Janneke Stalenhoef|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jan Verbakel|
|26 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Janneke Stalenhoef|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|6 Jun 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12879-017-2509-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.