You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Outcomes and prognostic factors of non-HIV patients with pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia and pulmonary CMV co-infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 Jul 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Beth A Garvy
26 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeffery L. Meier
28 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pierre Fillatre
17 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Qing Yu
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pierre Fillatre
3 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeffery L. Meier
23 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Qing Yu
Resubmission - Version 3
23 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
24 May 2017 Editorially accepted
5 Jun 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12879-017-2492-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement