- Case report
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Dirofilaria repens microfilariae from a human node fine-needle aspirate: a case report
© Sulekova et al. 2016
- Received: 5 January 2016
- Accepted: 14 May 2016
- Published: 6 June 2016
Human dirofilariosis is still a little known infection even in endemic areas. Dirofilariosis is zoonotic infection usually abortive in humans; instead, we report a very rare case (the 4th in the world), the first in Italy, in which at least two infective larvae became mature adults that mated and produced active microfilariae even though they did not reach peripheral blood.
A 30-year-old Italian woman presented with a transient oedematous swelling on the left abdominal wall with a creeping eruption followed by the occurrence of a subcutaneous nodular painless mass in the iliac region. One month later, a similar temporary swelling appeared on the contralateral inguinal region associated with intermittent joint discomfort in both knees. The patient had recently travelled abroad, therefore many possible diagnoses were to be ruled out. Routine laboratory investigations revealed eosinophilia. An ultrasound examination of the iliac swelling evidenced a well-defined cyst with a big filamentous formation in continuous movement. A fine-needle aspiration of the lesion was performed for parasitological, cytological and histological exams. The prompt microscopic examination of the aspired material showed the presence of numerous microfilariae that were initially morphologically attributed to Mansonella ozzardi. Subsequently, the revision of the Giemsa stained film and molecular analyses of the biological material, allowed to identify Dirofilaria repens as etiological agent of infection.
We report of a case in whom microfilariae were detected in fine-needle aspirate of subcutaneous node, without evidence of microfilaraemia, and the infection failed to become fully patent. Therefore we confirm that complete development and fertilization of D. repens worms in human hosts may occur, at variance with what is commonly believed, that Dirofilaria worms cannot fully develop in humans.
- Dirofilaria repens
- Fine-needle aspirate
- Molecular diagnostics
Dirofilariae are Onchocercidae nematodes that affect domestic and wild carnivores living in tropical and temperate regions of the World, where they are transmitted at the end of a mosquito blood meal, when infective larvae L3 leave the insect and penetrate into the skin. The most important vectors in Italy and in many European countries are the opportunistic feeders Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens , that may transmit the infection also to humans who are being increasingly found affected by this zoonosis . However, the L3s, which in animals develop to adult worms producing microfilariae that circulate in the bloodstream, in humans (not fully suitable hosts) only seldom reach the adult stage, and more rarely the developed adult worms meet, mate and yield microfilariae that, have been exceptionally reported in the blood [3–5]. Indeed, the penetration of active larvae is usually followed by a considerable antibody response that aborts most infections. The threadlike 1 mm-15 cm long worm often reaches the final location after long-lasting migrations through the human body and, easily detected in ocular locations, is barely suspected when is blocked in subcutaneous or in asymptomatic more internal tissues.
As for the Dirofilaria repens infection, it is usually characterized by the occurrence, 2–12 months after the L3 penetration, of a single subcutaneous nodule, often accompanied by local erythema, pruritus or urticarial manifestations. Usually, it hosts only one immature female, while nodule with one male specimen, much shorter and thinner, is rarely detected. In both cases, infection is devoid of specific characteristics, therefore deeply located nodules are often misidentified as malignant tumours, requiring invasive investigation and surgery before being correctly diagnosed.
We report the case observed in a traveller, firstly attributed to mansonellosis. Amended morphological and molecular identification of Dirofilaria repens was made on microfilariae detected only in a node aspirate, which is quite an exceptional event.
On first examination, the patient was asymptomatic and her physical examination was negative. Nevertheless, the following investigations were performed: i) revision of the Giemsa stained film; ii) molecular analyses of the biological material previously sent for histological analysis; iii) searching for microfilariae in peripheral blood; iv) serological test to detect reactivity to filarial antigens.
Slides were revised by microscopy; microfilariae were measured, and identified based on their morphological features. DNA was extracted from the paraffin block according to a previously reported method , and a cox1 (about 650-bp) gene fragment was PCR-amplified by using filarioid-generic primers as previously described . The amplicon was purified and sequenced; sequences were aligned using ClustalW program and compared with those available in GenBank (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). Finally, a blood sample was obtained on which the search for microfilariae by microscopy (on thick smears Giemsa stained after Knott’s concentration) and by PCR and finally testing for antibodies to antigens of Onchocercidae filariae by means of an ELISA test (Acanthocheilonema vitae, Bordier Affinity Products, Crissier, CE) were performed. The sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA test are respectively 95 and 98 %. It is important to note that this test does not differentiate between different filarial infections.
An ultrasound examination of the node one month after the biopsy and treatment with doxycycline and ivermectin did not show any images compatible with living parasites and physical examination did not point out any nodule to remove, therefore we did not pursue any surgical treatment, and we did not prescribe any antihelmintic drugs. On May 2015, 8 months after D. repens was diagnosed, WBC count was 9200/μl with eosinophils 160/μl (1,75 %). Nowadays, more than a year after D. repens diagnosis, the patient occasionally suffers from transient urticaria-like symptoms, mild inguinal pain and knees arthralgia, symptoms that are likely due to D. repens. She is still on follow-up to evaluate if new signs of parasitic infection, such as eosinophilia or evidence of new nodule develope.
About half of the human dirofilarioses identified in Europe are reported from Italy, and the case presented here occurred in an endemic area where many other cases have been identified. Nevertheless, there is a widespread lack of awareness for this zoonosis, and reliable diagnostic tests are applied only in few specific structures. Indeed, since the patient had travelled abroad, anthroponotic mansonellosis was a possible diagnostic option. The clinical progress of the infection included an initial migration of the parasite and the following development of a subcutaneous nodular painless mass. Early ultrasound examination of the node detected filamentous formation in continuous movement, a rare finding [8–10] that suggested the presence of an adult filaria and advised further investigations until the diagnosis of D. repens was made. However, when the patient was referred to the Policlinico University Hospital she was asymptomatic and physical examination was negative.
To the best of our knowledge, no data are available on the effects of ivermectin and doxycycline therapy against D. repens. Studies carried out on some anthroponotic filariae and on Dirofilaria immitis obtained discordant results. However, it seems that only doxycycline may have a possible adulticidal effect [2, 11], due to its action on the bacterial endosymbiont Wolbachia, present in most filarial species (D. repens included). It is conceivable that doxycycline had an adulticidal effect and a role in the absence of microfilariae in the bloodstream, but it should be taken in mind that the patient received only a brief course of treatment (14 days), and peripheral blood was tested for microfilariae 3 months after therapy withdrawal.
Should a new nodule appears, we will consider the possibility of removing the nodule. Should surgical removal be difficult to perform, we will prescribe a 6-week treatment with doxycycline, given its possible adulticidal effect.
The described case is remarkable for at least three reasons: firstly, from a biological point of view, since in humans rarely more than one adult develops, and only exceptionally mature worms meet, mate and generate active microfilariae (unusual immunotolerance of the unsuitable host). Secondly, the new-borne larvae remained inside the nodule without reaching the peripheral blood, as previously reported in only three cases [12–14], which makes the infection not fully patent. Finally, this is the first case of human dirofilariosis diagnosed in Italy based on microfilariae (by microscopy and molecular assays), therefore laboratories must carefully consider this diagnostic possibility when dealing with microfilariae. Indeed, as hypothesized by GIS models , this zoonosis is spreading. Cases are increasingly reported, and are found in areas where had never occurred previously, due to the global warming and drivers (i.e. increasing number of pets, parallel practice of animal abandoning, travelling in endemic areas with pets, and expanding urbanisation) that favour the parasite spreading and encourage the migration of the mosquito vectors from too warm areas to cooler habitats.
Even if Italy is the Country from which there have been reported about half of the cases of human dirofilariosis identified in Europe, there is a widespread lack of awareness of this parasitic disease, and reliable diagnostic tests are applied in few specialistic laboratories. Dirofilariosis should be included in the differential diagnosis in patients presenting subcutaneous nodules and clinicians must carefully consider this diagnostic possibility when dealing with microfilariae.
GIS, geographic information system; PCR, Polymerase chain reaction; WBC, white blood cells; bid: bis in die
The authors are grateful to the patient for her full consent to the publication of this case and for helpful provision of all necessary documentation.
The manuscript adheres to the CARE guidelines.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional files.
LFS reviewed the literature and wrote the manuscript. SG was responsible for diagnostic tests, performed the literature search and drafted of the manuscript. MD was directly responsible for the patient, performed the clinical examinations, and supervised the clinical case interpretation. GM carried out the molecular analysis. CM, BD collected the patient’s clinical data. GT revised the manuscript critically for intellectual content. GC conceived, coordinated and designed the study, and helped to draft the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
LFS (MD, Specialist of Tropical Diseases).
SG (Biologist, PhD of Public Health, Specialist in Microbiology and Virology).
MD (MD, PhD of Clinical and Experimental Immunoinfettivology).
GM (Biologist, Specialist of Microbiology and Virology).
CM (MD, Specialist of Infectious Diseases).
BM (MD, Specialist of Pathological Anatomy).
GT (MD, Full Professor of Infectious Diseases).
GC (Biologist, Associate Professor of Parasitology).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Cancrini G, Gabrielli S. Vectors of Dirofilaria nematodes: biology, behaviour and host/parasite relationships. In: Genchi C, Rinaldi L, Cringoli G, editors. Mappe parassitologiche. Vol. VIII. Dirofilaria immitis and D. repens in dog and cat and human infections. Napoli: Rolando Editore; 2007. p. 47–58.Google Scholar
- Simón F, Siles-Lucas M, Morchón R, González-Miguel J, Mellado I, Carretón E, et al. Human and animal dirofilariasis: the emergence of a zoonotic mosaic. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25:507–44.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nozais JP, Bain O, Gentilini M. A case of subcutaneous Dirofilaria (Nochtiella) repens with microfilaremia originating in Corsica. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1994;87:183–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petrocheilou V, Theodorakis M, Williams J, Prifti H, Georgilis K, Apostolopoulou II, et al. Microfilaremia from a Dirofilaria-like parasite in Greece. Case report. APMIS. 1998;106:315–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dóczi I, Bereczki L, Gyetvai T, Fejes I, Skribek Á, Szabó Á, et al. Description of five dirofilariasis cases in South Hungary and review epidemiology of this disease for the country. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2015;127:696–702.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shi SR, Cote RJ, Wu L, Liu C, Datar R, Shi Y, et al. DNA extraction from archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections based on the antigen retrieval principle: heating under the influence of pH. J Histochem Cytochem. 2002;50:1005–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ferri E, Barbuto M, Bain O, Galimberti A, Uni S, Guerrero R, Ferte H, Bandi C, Martin C, Casiraghi M. Integrated taxonomy: traditional approach and DNA barcoding for the identification of filarioid worms and related parasites (Nematoda) Front. Zool. 2009;6:1.Google Scholar
- Smitha M, Rajendran VR, Devarajan E, Anitha PM. Case report: Orbital dirofilariasis. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2008;18:60–2.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gopinath TN, Lakshmi KP, Shaji PC, Rajalakshmi PC. Periorbital dirofilariasis - clinical and imaging findings: live worm on ultrasound. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013;61:298–300.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chan CC, Kermanshahi MS, Mathew B, England RJ. A rare case of Dirofilaria repens infection. J Laryngol Otol. 2013;127:607–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McCall JW, Kramer L, Genchi C, Guerrero J, Dzimianski MT, Mansour A, et al. Effects of doxycycline on heartworm embryogenesis, transmission, circulating microfilaria, and adult worms in microfilaremic dogs. Vet Parasitol. 2014;206:5–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Negahban S, Daneshbod Y, Atefi S, Daneshbod K, Sadjjadi SM, Hosseini SV, et al. Dirofilaria repens diagnosed by the presence of microfilariae in fine needle aspirates: a case report. Acta Cytol. 2007;51:567–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Poppert S, Hodapp M, Krueger A, Hegasy G, Niesen WD, Kern WV, et al. Dirofilaria repens infection and concomitant meningoencephalitis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:1844–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Damle AS, Iravane Bajaj JA, Khaparkhuntikar MN, Maher GT, Patil RV. Microfilaria in human subcutaneous dirofilariasis: a case report. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8:113–4.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Medlock JM, Barrass I, Kerrod E, Taylor MA, Leach S. Analysis of climatic predictions for extrinsic incubation of Dirofilaria in the United Kingdom. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2007;7:4–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar