Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

One-step real-time RT-PCR assays for serotyping dengue virus in clinical samples

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1, 2 and
  • 1
BMC Infectious Diseases201515:493

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1226-z

  • Received: 18 May 2015
  • Accepted: 19 October 2015
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Dengue is one of the leading causes of morbidity in tropical and subtropical regions and infection with any of the four dengue virus serotypes (DENV1-4) result in a wide range of clinical manifestations. Given the geographic expansion of DENV1-4, assays for serotyping are needed to be able to perform surveillance and epidemiological studies. In this study, we describe the design and validation of one-step real-time serotype-specific DENV RT-PCR assays.

Methods

The DENV1, DENV2, DENV3, and DENV4 RT-PCR assays were designed using all available whole genome DENV sequences in the NCBI nucleotide collection. Because of the high mutation rates of RNA viruses, the assays were performed in singleplex format to enable quick modifications to the primer and probe sequences when new genetic variants emerge. The analytical performance of the RT-PCR assays were evaluated using in vitro transcribed RNA and their specificity was determined by testing 24 DENV isolates, external DENV control panels and RNA preparation of non-DENV flaviviruses and non-dengue clinical samples. Additionally, the clinical performance of the serotype-specific DENV RT-PCR were compared to that of the CDC DENV-1-4 RT-PCR using 85 clinical samples collected from patients presenting with acute dengue.

Results

The RT-PCR assays were found to be specific for their respective serotype and did not cross-react with other flaviviruses or human mRNA. All assays had a linear dynamic range of 102 to 106 copies/reaction with detection limits between 12 and 44 copies/reaction. When testing sera from 85 confirmed acute dengue cases, the serotype-specific DENV RT-PCR assays had 100 % positive agreement with the FDA-approved CDC DENV-1-4 RT-PCR assay performed in a singleplex format. Additionally 15 samples that tested negative in the CDC DENV-1-4- RT-PCR assay were found positive using the serotype-specific DENV RT-PCR assays.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that these RT-PCR assays are useful alternatives to existing methods for serotyping DENV in clinical sera.

Keywords

  • Dengue virus
  • Serotype
  • RT-PCR
  • Laboratory diagnosis
  • Serotyping

Background

Dengue is the most widespread mosquito-borne viral disease with an estimated 390 million infections yearly [1, 2]. In the last decades, the global distribution of dengue virus (DENV) has expanded to include more geographic areas and all four serotypes (DENV1-4) are now present in Asia, Africa, and the Americas [3]. Not only is dengue a public health concern in endemic regions, dengue has also been increasingly reported in returning travelers [4, 5]. Infection with any of the DENV serotypes is commonly asymptomatic or presented as a feverish illness accompanied by severe headache, muscle and joint pains, and vomiting [6, 7]. Approximately 500 000 cases annually require hospitalization [3]. Severe dengue is characterized by abdominal pain, bleeding, fatigue, and persistent vomiting, and can lead to deadly complications [8, 9].

Acute dengue can be diagnosed by detecting the DENV genome. A number of real-time RT-PCR assays have previously been developed [1014], including a universal DENV real-time RT-PCR designed and validated at our laboratory [15]. Methods detecting DENV genomes are recommended by the World Health Organization to be used for laboratory confirmation of dengue during the first five to six days after symptomatic onset [16] and PCR-based techniques are at present the only methods for determining the infecting serotype during acute disease.

Here we present the development and clinical validation of four DENV serotype-specific real-time RT-PCR assays useful in situations requiring serotyping. Like many RNA viruses, DENV displays considerable genetic diversity [17]. Consequently, these serotype-specific RT-PCR assays were set up in singleplex format, allowing easy modification of the individual assays when new genetic variants emerge. The DENV1, DENV2, DENV3, and DENV4 real-time RT-PCR assays were designed using all DENV1 (n = 1532), DENV2 (n = 1117), DENV3 (n = 832), and DENV4 (n = 145) whole genome sequences available in the NCBI nucleotide collection at the design stage. The performance and specificity of the assays were evaluated by analyzing in vitro transcribed RNA, DENV isolates, and external control panels. Using 85 serum samples obtained from travelers returning from the tropics presenting with acute dengue, the DENV1, DENV2, DENV3 and DENV4 RT-PCR assays were compared to the CDC DENV-1-4 RT-PCR assay [10]. The theoretical and clinical validation of these DENV serotype-specific RT-PCR assays suggest that they are good alternatives to existing methods for serotyping DENV in clinical samples.

Methods

Primer and probe design

To be able to find serotype-specific conserved regions, all whole genome sequences of DENV1-4 available at the design stage (2014–10–31) were downloaded from NCBI and used for assay design. Multiple sequence alignments containing the genomic sequences of the individual serotypes and alignments containing all DENV genomic sequences were created using CLC Genomics Workbench 7.5 (www.clcbio.com). Primers and probes were constructed using in-house software. Melting temperatures (Tm) were verified using Primer Express® v3.0 (Applied Biosystems®). Theoretical specificity of the systems was investigated using BLAST against the NCBI nucleotide database with very loose match criteria (word-size = 7, E-cutoff = 1000, match/mismatch cost +1/-1, gap cost 5/2).

RNA extraction

Viral RNA was extracted from 140 μL supernatant of infected cells or from patient sera using QIAamp® viral RNA extraction kit (Qiagen), following the protocol from the manufacturer. RNA was eluted in 60 μL elution buffer and stored at –80 °C pending analysis. Infectious cell supernatant was subjected to Trizol LS®/chloroform treatment following the manufacturer’s instruction (Invitrogen™) prior to RNA extraction. To confirm the integrity of the extraction reagents and the successful recovery of RNA from clinical samples, the presence of human beta-actin mRNA was analyzed using a commercial TaqMan® probe-based RT-PCR assay (Applied Biosystems®).

One-step real-time RT-PCR assays

The DENV1, DENV2, DENV3, and DENV4 RT-PCR assays were carried out in 25 μL reaction mixtures containing 5 μL template RNA, TaqMan® Fast Virus 1-step mastermix (Applied Biosystems®), UltraPure™ DNase/RNase-Free Distilled Water (Invitrogen™), 0.9 μM of each primer, and 0.2 μM probe (Table 1). The MGB-probes were labeled with FAM reporter dye and a non-fluorescent quencher. Primers and probes were purchased from Life Technologies. Amplification and detection were performed in a StepOne Plus real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems®). Thermocycling parameters were as follows: reverse transcription at 50 °C for 5 min, inactivation at 95 °C for 20 s, followed by 45 cycles of fluorescence detection at 95 °C for 3 s, and annealing at 60 °C for 30 s. The baseline and threshold were set using the auto-baseline and threshold feature in StepOne Software v2.2.2 (Applied Biosystems®). Samples were considered positive if target amplification was recorded within 40 cycles.
Table 1

Primer and probe sequences

Assay

Primer/probe

Amplicon size (nt)

Target region

Sequences (5’-3’)

Position

Tm

DENV1

DENV1_F

71

NS5

CAATGGATGACAACAGAAGAYATG

9974–9997

56.6

 

DENV1_R

  

TCCATCCATGGGTTTTCCTCTAT

10022–10044

59.5

 

DENV1_P

  

TCAGTGTGGAATAGGGTTT

10001–10019

70.0

DENV2

DENV2_F

199

E protein

GCAGAAACACAACATGGAACRATAGT

1873–1898

56.6

 

DENV2_R

  

TGATGTAGCTGTCTCCRAATGG

2050–2071

59.8

 

DENV2_P

  

TCAACATAGAAGCAGAACC

2030–2048

68.0

DENV3

DENV3_F

167

NS1

ATGGAATGTGTGGGAGGTGG

2860–2879

59.1

 

DENV3_R

  

GGCTTTCTATCCARTAGCCCATG

3004–3026

59.8

 

DENV3_P

  

TATGGCTGAAACTCCGAG

2913–2930

68.0

DENV4

DENV4_F

114

5’ UTR/

GCAGATCTCTGGAAAAATGAACCA

86–109

60.4

 

DENV4_R

 

capsid

GAGAATCTCTTCACCAACCCYTG

177–199

59.8

 

DENV4_P

 

protein

TCAATATGCTGAAACGC

136–152

68.0

Degenerated nucleotides (nt): R: A/G, Y: G/A/C. The MGB-modified probes were labelled with FAM and a non-fluorescence quencher (NFQ)

Genome positions are given according to the NCBI reference sequence for DENV1 [GenBank:NC_001477], DENV2 [GenBank:NC_001474], DENV3 [GenBank:NC_001475], and DENV4 [GenBank:NC_002640]

The mean melting temperatures (Tm) are shown for primers with degenerated nucleotides

The CDC DENV-1-4 Real-Time RT-PCR Assay [10] was performed in singleplex reactions following the manufacturer’s instructions (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) in 25 μL volumes using the SuperScript® III Platinum® One-Step qRT-PCR Kit (Invitrogen™). Amplification and detection were performed in a 7500 Fast DX Real-time PCR instrument (Applied Biosystems®). The data analysis were performed as described in the manufacturer’s guidelines. In short, the threshold was adjusted to fall within the PCR exponential phase in the linear view. The manufacturer’s instructions specifies that a specimen is considered positive for either DENV1, 2, 3, or 4 if the amplification curve crosses the threshold line within 37 cycles (Cq < 37).

Amplification efficiency, linear dynamic range, and limit of detection

The efficiency of amplification and the dynamic range were determined by testing triplicates of 10-fold serial dilutions of in vitro transcribed RNA (BioSynthesis Inc.). The RNA transcripts were 158, 235, 189, and 133 nt in length and were based on the sequences of DENV1 [GenBank:GU131828], DENV2 [GenBank:EU482743], DENV3 [GenBank:AY679147], and DENV4 [GenBank:GQ199881], respectively. The RNA was diluted in RNase/DNase-free water (Life Technologies) and stored at –80°C. The RNA concentration was determined by the manufacturer and verified using a Nano Drop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific).

The limit of detection (LoD) was determined by testing two-fold serially diluted in vitro transcribed RNA close to the detection limit of the assay. The transcript RNA was tested in eight replicates in three separate experiments and LoD was defined as the last dilution in which a fluorescence signal could be detected in all 24 replicates. Dilutions and other pipetting procedures were performed using a robotic QIAgility™ workstation (Qiagen).

Specificity study

DENV used in this study was DENV1 (8356/10, Hawaii, and West Pac.), DENV2 (4397/11 and NewGuinea C), DENV3 (3140/09 and H-87), DENV4 (3274/09 and H-241) and 15 partly sequenced DENV isolates: DENV1 (n = 8), DENV2 (n = 3), and DENV3 (n = 4). The following 12 non-DENV agents were selected for the specificity validation: Andes virus (ANDV), chikungunya virus (CHIKV), hantaan virus (HTNV), Lassa virus (LASV), Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV), Seoul virus (SEOV), Dobrava-Belgrade virus (DOBV), tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV), Usutu virus (USUV), West Nile virus (WNV), yellow fever virus (YFV), and Zika virus (ZIKV). Hantaviruses were propagated in Vero E6 cells (ATCC: 1586) in Minimal Essential Medium supplemented with 5 % fetal bovine serum, 1 mM HEPES, and 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin. CHIKV, DENV, LASV, RVFV, TBEV, USUV, WNV, YFV, and ZIKV were propagated in Vero cells (ATCC: CCL-81) in Medium 199 supplemented with 5 % fetal bovine serum, 1 mM HEPES, and 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin. All reagents were from Gibco, Life Technologies. Cells were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5 % CO2. All handling of infectious material was performed in bio-safety level (BSL) 3, and for LASV, BSL 4 containment laboratories. External DENV control panels were obtained from Quality Control for Molecular Diagnostics (QCMD) in the years of 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014.

Clinical samples

Serum samples (n = 85) collected during 2014–2015 from Swedish residents returning from travel with confirmed dengue were obtained from the biorepository of the Public Health Agency of Sweden as stipulated in the regulations for use of such material in diagnostic development and quality assessment. The Public Health Agency of Sweden performs all dengue diagnostics in Sweden and the biobank deposited samples used in this study had previously been confirmed DENV positive by using a universal one-step real-time DENV RT-PCR [15] and the SD Bioline Dengue NS1 Ag Rapid Test (Standard Diagnostics, Inc.). Additionally, all patients had been confirmed as having dengue using Panbio® Dengue IgM capture ELISA (Alere™) and in a few cases an in-house IFA [18]. Serum samples (n = 40) collected during 2014 from non-dengue cases were used for testing possible unspecific reactions of the DENV1, DENV2, DENV3, and DENV4 real-time RT-PCR assays with human RNA. No informed consent or ethical permit was required since The Swedish Ethical Review Act (2003:16), Ethical Review of Research Involving Humans (http://www.epn.se/media/1205/the_ethical_review_act.pdf) is not applicable for diagnostic development and quality assessment.

Results and discussion

The primers and probes were designed using 1532 DENV1, 1117 DENV2, 832 DENV3, and 145 DENV4 complete genome sequences. To minimize the possibility of unspecific detection of non-targeted serotypes, the individual RT-PCR assays were designed to have a minimum number of mismatches to the targeted DENV serotype (Additional file 1) while a maximum number of mismatches in the 3’ region of the primers and evenly distributed mismatches in the probe in respect to the sequences of non-targeted serotypes (Additional file 2). The sequences of the primers and probes can be found in Table 1. BLAST against all non-DENV sequences in the NCBI Nucleotide Collection indicated no risk of cross-reaction with other species.

To determine the amplification efficiency and the linear dynamic range, in vitro transcribed RNA was 10-fold serially diluted and tested in triplicates in the individual assays. All assays had a linear dynamic range from 102 to 108 copies/reaction (Fig. 1). Over this interval the amplification efficiency was 96 % (R2 = 0.999, y-intercept = 37.4), 97 % (R2 = 1, y-intercept = 38.8), 97 % (R2 = 0.999, y-intercept = 37.7), and 102 % (R2 = 0.999, y-intercept = 38.1) for the DENV1, DENV2, DENV3, and DENV4 RT-PCR assay, respectively (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Linear dynamic range. The linear dynamic ranges of the RT-PCR assays were determined by testing triplicates of 10-fold serially diluted in vitro transcribed RNA. Panel (a) represents the DENV1 assay, and (b), (c), and (d) the DENV2, DENV3, and DENV4 RT-PCR assays, respectively. Each dot represents the mean Cq-value from three replicates, the error bars indicate 95 % confidence intervals, and the lines represents the best fitting lin-log regression models

LoD was determined by testing two-fold serial dilutions of in vitro transcribed RNA in 24 replicates (Fig. 2). The detection limits for the one-step real-time DENV1, DENV2, DENV3, and DENV4 RT-PCR assays were 37 copies/reaction (Fig. 2a), 20 copies/reaction (Fig. 2b), 12 copies/reaction (Fig. 2c), and 44 copies/reaction (Fig. 2d), respectively.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Limit of detection. Limit of detection was determined by assaying eight replicates of twofold serially diluted RNA transcripts in three separate experiments. The number of positives per total number of replicates tested is shown for (a) the DENV1 RT-PCR assay, (b) the DENV2 RT-PCR assay, (c) the DENV3 RT-PCR assay, and (d) the DENV4 RT-PCR assay. Horizontal lines indicate mean values, boxes denote the 25th to 75th percentiles, whiskers the 5–95 % percentiles, and dots represent outliers

The assays were evaluated for their specificity by testing 24 DENV isolates and four external QCMD control panels, each including 10 samples containing different concentrations of DENV and two negative controls (Table 2). The four serotype-specific RT-PCR assays correctly classified all samples with no observed cross-reactions (Table 2). To confirm that the primers and probes of the DENV1, DENV2, DENV3, and DENV4 RT-PCR assays did not react with human RNA, RNA preparations of 40 serum samples obtained from patient with non-dengue diagnosis were analyzed. All of these samples contained mRNA of human beta-actin, indicating adequate RNA extraction. No signal was observed in the DENV1, DENV2, DENV3, and DENV4 RT-PCR assays.
Table 2

Specificity of the DENV1, DENV2, DENV3, and DENV4 real-time RT-PCR assays

Sample

No. of positive samples/no. tested

 

DENV1 RT-PCR

DENV2 RT-PCR

DENV3 RT-PCR

DENV4 RT-PCR

DENV1 isolates

11/11

0/11

0/11

0/11

DENV2 isolates

0/5

5/5

0/5

0/5

DENV3 isolates

0/6

0/6

6/6

0/6

DENV4 isolates

0/2

0/2

0/2

2/2

QCMD panel, DENV1

17/17

0/17

0/17

0/17

QCMD panel, DENV2

0/11

11/11

0/11

0/11

QCMD panel, DENV3

0/8

0/8

8/8

0/8

QCMD panel, DENV4

0/4

0/4

0/4

4/4

QCMD negative controls

0/8

0/8

0/8

0/8

RNA preparations from DENV1, DENV2, DENV3, and DENV4 isolates obtained Cq-values between 16 and 25 when analyzed using their respective serotype-specific RT-PCR assay

The concentrations of DENV1, DENV2, and DENV3 included in the QCMD panels were 103 to 106, 102 to 105, and 103 to 105 copies/mL, respectively. The concentration of DENV4 was 105 copies/mL in all four QCMD panel samples

The differential diagnosis of dengue can be challenging due to the wide range of clinical manifestations [6, 9]. For this reason, the specificity of the RT-PCR assays were further evaluated by testing RNA extracted from high-titred solutions of other flaviviruses and viruses important for dengue differential diagnosis. No unspecific reactions were observed for RNA extracted from preparations of other flaviviruses (TBEV, USUV, WNV, YFV, and ZIKV) or non-flaviviruses (ANDV, CHIKV, DOBV, HTNV, RVFV, LASV, and SEOV).

The serotype-specific DENV RT-PCR assays were evaluated for their clinical performance by retrospectively testing 85 serum samples obtained from patients presenting with acute dengue (Table 3). These 85 serum samples were also tested using the FDA-approved CDC DENV-1-4 RT-PCR (reference method) performed in singleplex format [10] (Table 3). The DENV1, DENV2, DENV3, and DENV4 RT-PCR assay (test methods) results were all in 100 % positive agreement [19] to the CDC DENV-1-4 RT-PCR results , i.e. all samples that were positive in the reference method were also positive in the test methods (Table 3 and Additional file 3). An additional 15 samples not detected by the CDC DENV RT-PCR assay were classified as DENV1 (n = 6), DENV2 (n = 6), DENV3 (n = 2), and DENV4 (n = 1) using the DENV1, DENV2, DENV3, and DENV RT-PCR assays, respectively (Table 3 and Additional file 3). Four of these 15 samples were collected between days 4 and 5 after symptomatic onset, the remaining 11 samples were collected days 6–9. The DENV1 and DENV2 assays were found to be more sensitive than the CDC DENV1 and DENV2 assays (Chi-square test, p = 0.009 and p = 0.003, respectively). The DENV3 and DENV4 assays were not found to be significantly more sensitive than the CDC DENV3 and DENV4 assays (Chi-square test, p = 0.11 and p = 0.28, respectively). The CDC DENV-1-4 RT-PCR assay has previously been shown to be less sensitive than an in-house developed RT-PCR assay especially for serum samples collected more than 5 days after symptomatic onset [20].
Table 3

Comparable analysis between the serotype-specific RT-PCR assays and the CDC DENV1-4 RT-PCR

  

CDC DENV1 RT-PCR

  

negative

Positive

DENV1 RT-PCR

negative

36

0

 

positive

6

43

  

CDC DENV2 RT-PCR

  

negative

positive

DENV2 RT-PCR

negative

67

0

 

positive

6

12

  

CDC DENV3 RT-PCR

  

negative

positive

DENV3 RT-PCR

negative

76

0

 

positive

2

7

  

CDC DENV4 RT-PCR

  

negative

positive

DENV4 RT-PCR

negative

78

0

 

positive

1

6

A sample was classified as positive in the CDC DENV-1-4 real-time RT-PCR assays if the amplification curve crossed the threshold line within 37 cycles

Five of the six DENV1 RT-PCR positive samples, two of the six DENV2 RT-PCR positive samples, both the DENV3 RT-PCR positive samples, and the DENV4 RT-PCR positive sample that tested negative in respective CDC DENV-1-4 RT-PCR singleplex assay crossed the threshold line between 37 and 40 cycles in the CDC assays

Conclusions

The four DENV serotype-specific RT-PCR assays presented here were able to successfully serotype dengue in clinical samples. RNA preparations of 40 serum samples obtained from patient with non-dengue diagnosis did not show unspecific reactions, however, it should be noted that the assay have only been evaluated using selected samples i.e. samples already confirmed as DENV positive. No unspecific reactions were observed when high-titred preparations of non-targeted DENV serotypes were analyzed, this may be useful especially considering that co-circulations of several serotypes as well as co-infections with two serotypes have been reported [2123]. The DENV1 and DENV2 RT-PCR assays were found to be more sensitive than the corresponding FDA-approved CDC DENV assays and the DENV3 and DENV4 were found to be at least as sensitive as the corresponding CDC DENV assays when serum samples from 85 acute dengue cases were analyzed. This indicates that the DENV1, DENV2, DENV3 and DENV4 assays are useful alternatives to other methods for serotyping DENV.

Abbreviations

ANDV: 

Andes virus

BLAST: 

Basic local alignment search tool

BSL: 

Biosafety level

CDC: 

Center of Disease Control

CHIKV: 

Chikungunya virus

Cq: 

Quantification cycle

DENV: 

Dengue virus

DENV1-4: 

Dengue virus serotype 1-4

DOBV: 

Dobrava-Belgrade virus

FAM: 

6-carboxyfluorescein

FDA: 

Food and Drug Administration

HTNV: 

Hantaan virus

LASV: 

Lassa virus

LoD: 

Limit of detection

MGB: 

Minor groove binder

NCBI: 

National Center for Biotechnology Information

NFQ: 

Non-fluorescence quencher

nt: 

Nucleotide

QCMD: 

Quality Control for Molecular Diagnostics

RT-PCR: 

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

RVFV: 

Rift Valley fever virus

SEOV: 

Seoul virus

TBEV: 

Tick-borne encephalitis virus

Tm: 

Melting temperature

USUV: 

Usutu virus

WNV: 

West Nile virus

ZIKV: 

Zika virus

Declarations

Acknowledgement

The authors thank the European Virus Archive (EVA) for providing DENV (strains 8356/10, 4397/11, 3140/09, and 3274/09), LASV, and ZIKV.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Microbiology, The Public Health Agency of Sweden, SE-171 82, Solna, Sweden
(2)
Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden

References

  1. Gubler DJ. Epidemic dengue/dengue hemorrhagic fever as a public health, social and economic problem in the 21st century. Trends Microbiol. 2002;10(2):100–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature. 2013;496(7446):504–7. doi:10.1038/nature12060.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Guzman MG, Halstead SB, Artsob H, Buchy P, Farrar J, Gubler DJ, et al. Dengue: a continuing global threat. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8(12 Suppl):S7–16. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2460.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Wilder-Smith A, Schwartz E. Dengue in travelers. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(9):924–32. doi:10.1056/NEJMra041927.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Schlagenhauf P, Weld L, Goorhuis A, Gautret P, Weber R, von Sonnenburg F, et al. Travel-associated infection presenting in Europe (2008-12): an analysis of EuroTravNet longitudinal, surveillance data, and evaluation of the effect of the pre-travel consultation. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(14)71000-X.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Low JG, Ong A, Tan LK, Chaterji S, Chow A, Lim WY, et al. The early clinical features of dengue in adults: challenges for early clinical diagnosis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(5), e1191. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001191.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Endy TP, Anderson KB, Nisalak A, Yoon IK, Green S, Rothman AL, et al. Determinants of inapparent and symptomatic dengue infection in a prospective study of primary school children in Kamphaeng Phet, Thailand. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(3), e975. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000975.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Huy NT, Van Giang T, Thuy DH, Kikuchi M, Hien TT, Zamora J, et al. Factors associated with dengue shock syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(9), e2412. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002412.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Thomas L, Moravie V, Besnier F, Valentino R, Kaidomar S, Coquet LV, et al. Clinical presentation of dengue among patients admitted to the adult emergency department of a tertiary care hospital in Martinique: implications for triage, management, and reporting. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;59(1):42–50. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.08.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Santiago GA, Vergne E, Quiles Y, Cosme J, Vazquez J, Medina JF, et al. Analytical and clinical performance of the CDC real time RT-PCR assay for detection and typing of dengue virus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(7), e2311. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002311.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Waggoner JJ, Abeynayake J, Sahoo MK, Gresh L, Tellez Y, Gonzalez K, et al. Development of an internally controlled real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assay for pan-dengue virus detection and comparison of four molecular dengue virus detection assays. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(7):2172–81. doi:10.1128/JCM.00548-13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Waggoner JJ, Abeynayake J, Sahoo MK, Gresh L, Tellez Y, Gonzalez K, et al. Single-reaction, multiplex, real-time rt-PCR for the detection, quantitation, and serotyping of dengue viruses. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(4), e2116. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002116.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Cecilia D, Kakade M, Alagarasu K, Patil J, Salunke A, Parashar D, et al. Development of a multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay for simultaneous detection of dengue and chikungunya viruses. Arch Virol. 2015;160(1):323–7. doi:10.1007/s00705-014-2217-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Najioullah F, Viron F, Cesaire R. Evaluation of four commercial real-time RT-PCR kits for the detection of dengue viruses in clinical samples. Virol J. 2014;11:164. doi:10.1186/1743-422X-11-164.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Alm E, Lesko B, Lindegren G, Ahlm C, Soderholm S, Falk KI, et al. Universal single-probe rt-PCR assay for diagnosis of dengue virus infections. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(12), e3416. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0003416.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. WHO. Dengue: Guidlines for Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention adn Control., vol New edn. Geneva: WHO; 2009.Google Scholar
  17. Holmes EC, Burch SS. The causes and consequences of genetic variation in dengue virus. Trends Microbiol. 2000;8(2):74–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Vene S, Mangiafico J, Niklasson B. Indirect immunofluorescence for serological diagnosis of dengue virus infections in Swedish patients. Clin Diagn Virol. 1995;4(1):43–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cicchetti DV, Feinstein AR. High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):551–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Waggoner JJ, Abeynayake J, Sahoo MK, Gresh L, Tellez Y, Gonzalez K, et al. Comparison of the FDA-approved CDC DENV-1-4 real-time reverse transcription-PCR with a laboratory-developed assay for dengue virus detection and serotyping. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(10):3418–20. doi:10.1128/JCM.01359-13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Cnops L, Domingo C, Van den Bossche D, Vekens E, Brigou E, Van Esbroeck M. First dengue co-infection in a Belgian traveler returning from Thailand, July 2013. J Clin Virol. 2014;61(4):597–9. doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2014.10.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Dar L, Gupta E, Narang P, Broor S. Cocirculation of dengue serotypes, Delhi, India, 2003. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12(2):352–3. doi:10.3201/eid1202.050767.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Vinodkumar CS, Kalapannavar NK, Basavarajappa KG, Sanjay D, Gowli C, Nadig NG, et al. Episode of coexisting infections with multiple dengue virus serotypes in central Karnataka, India. J Infect Public Health. 2013;6(4):302–6. doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2013.01.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Alm et al. 2015

Advertisement