You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Challenge of conducting a placebo-controlled randomized efficacy study for influenza vaccine in a season with low attack rate and a mismatched vaccine B strain: a concrete example

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Oct 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jodie McVernon
3 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tom Jefferson
5 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Suzanne Ohmit
7 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fred Aoki
16 Dec 2008 Author responded Author comments - Jiri Beran
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Dec 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Jan 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jiri Beran
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Jan 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
15 Jan 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jiri Beran
Resubmission - Version 6
15 Jan 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
17 Jan 2009 Editorially accepted
17 Jan 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-9-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement