You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam for the treatment of complicated infections: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 May 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
8 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Mao Mao An
Resubmission - Version 2
8 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Mao Mao An
Resubmission - Version 4
9 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Raffaele Pezzilli
30 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Petros Rafailidis
21 Jul 2009 Author responded Author comments - Mao Mao An
Resubmission - Version 5
21 Jul 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
12 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Raffaele Pezzilli
24 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Petros Rafailidis
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
2 Dec 2009 Editorially accepted
2 Dec 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-9-193

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement