You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Evaluation of routinely reported surgical site infections against microbiological culture results: a tool to identify patient groups where diagnosis and treatment may be improved

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Apr 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
29 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Claire Lietard
24 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Didier Lepelletier
4 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - Perla Marang-van de Mheen
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Sep 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Didier Lepelletier
28 Sep 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Claire Lietard
15 Oct 2009 Author responded Author comments - Perla Marang-van de Mheen
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Oct 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
26 Oct 2009 Author responded Author comments - Perla Marang-van de Mheen
Resubmission - Version 5
26 Oct 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
2 Nov 2009 Author responded Author comments - Perla Marang-van de Mheen
Resubmission - Version 9
2 Nov 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
10 Nov 2009 Editorially accepted
10 Nov 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-9-176

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement