- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Varicella and Herpes Zoster in Madrid, based on the Sentinel General Practitioner Network: 1997–2004
- Napoleón Pérez-Farinós†1Email author,
- María Ordobás†1,
- Cristina García-Fernández1,
- Luis García-Comas1,
- Soledad Cañellas1,
- Inmaculada Rodero1,
- Ángeles Gutiérrez-Rodríguez1,
- Juan García-Gutiérrez1 and
- Rosa Ramírez1
© Pérez-Farinós et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
- Received: 21 February 2007
- Accepted: 15 June 2007
- Published: 15 June 2007
Varicella (chickenpox) is the primary disease caused by varicella-zoster virus. It is extremely contagious and is frequent in children. Indeed, in the absence of vaccination, a high proportion of the population is liable to contract it. Herpes zoster -more frequent among adults- is caused by reactivation of the latent virus. The objective of this study is to describe the status of and time trend for varicella and herpes zoster in the Madrid Autonomous Region prior to the introduction of the vaccine to the general population.
Data source: individualised varicella and herpes zoster case records kept by the Madrid Autonomous Region Sentinel General Practitioner Network for the period 1997–2004. Cumulative incidences, crude and standardised incidence rates, and age-specific rates of varicella and herpes zoster were calculated for each year. Kendall's Tau-b correlation coefficient was calculated to evaluate whether incidence displayed a time trend. Spectral density in the time series of weekly incidences was estimated using a periodogram.
Standardised annual varicella incidence rates ranged from 742.5 (95% CI: 687.2 – 797.7) to 1239.6 (95% CI: 1164.5 – 1313.4) cases per 100 000 person-years. Most cases affected children, though complications were more frequent in adults. Varicella incidence displayed an annual periodicity but no trend over time. Most herpes zoster cases occurred at advanced ages, with incidence registering a rising annual trend but no seasonality factor.
In the absence of vaccination, no significant changes in varicella incidence were in evidence recent years, though these were observed in the incidence of herpes zoster. Sentinel general practitioner networks are a valid instrument for surveillance of diseases such as varicella. Further varicella vaccination-coverage and vaccine-efficacy studies are called for.
- Herpes Zoster
- Varicella Vaccine
- Standardise Incidence Rate
- Zoster Vaccine
- Sentinel Network
Varicella (chickenpox) is the primary disease caused by the varicella-zoster virus. It mainly affects children and, in most cases, its clinical features include mild vesicular exanthema. Although less frequent among adults, the disease can nevertheless be more severe, leading to a greater number of complications which may even prove life-threatening. Due to its extreme contagiousness, in the absence of vaccination most people have suffered from the disease by the time they reach adulthood.
Herpes zoster is a secondary infection caused by reactivation of the latent virus, and principally affects adults[1, 2]. It is less frequent than varicella, and the risk of suffering herpes zoster over the course of a lifetime has been estimated between 20 at 30%[1, 3].
The introduction of universal varicella vaccination in children has been controversial, owing to its possible effects on the disease itself and on herpes zoster. Initially the vaccine was exclusively used on immunodepressed patients, but subsequently its general use was authorised in a number of countries, including Japan, South Korea (1988), United States, Sweden and Germany (1995). In Spain it was first introduced in 1997 for high-risk patients, and in 2005 it was included in the vaccination schedule for administration to adolescents who had not suffered the illness, whereas the Spanish Paediatric Association as been recommending vaccination in children as from the age of 12 months since 1999. Recently, the Madrid Autonomous Region (MAR) has included universal varicella vaccination in its systematic vaccination schedule for children aged 15 months. According to a series of studies, the varicella vaccine now in use in various countries is effective[9, 10]. As regards the immunity conferred, some studies indicate that it is high but this is not yet clear and it would seem that at least two doses of vaccine are needed[11, 12].
A vaccine against herpes zoster and post-herpetic neuralgia is currently being developed, and it is not well known about how this may influence the possible effect of varicella immunisation on herpes zoster and, as a result, on the indications and effectiveness of the herpes zoster vaccine[13, 14].
Sentinel networks are an increasingly useful tool in epidemiological surveillance and research. The MAR Sentinel General Practitioner Network (SGPN) came into operation in 1991, and the reporters are volunteer physicians.
This study sought to describe the status of and evolution for varicella and herpes zoster in the MAR, based on case reports of the SGPN, from 1997, the year in which these diseases first came under surveillance, until 2004, prior to the introduction of the varicella vaccine into the general population.
The Madrid Region Sentinel General Practitioner Network is made up of general practitioners and primary care paediatricians who voluntarily submit weekly reports of cases of varicella and herpes zoster, as well as other diseases. The population attended by these physicians is representative, in terms of age and gender, and accounts for approximately 2% of the total population of the MAR.
A case of varicella was defined as an acute disease with moderate fever (< 38.5°C) and vesicular exanthema, which evolves in the form of outbreaks, and gives rise to lesions that swiftly develop from superficial papules into vesicles, and occasionally into scabs. A case of herpes zoster was defined as a vesicular rash, generally unilateral, with dermatomeric distribution.
Apart from age and sex, data recorded in varicella cases included previous exposure to other cases of varicella or herpes zoster, place of exposure (if known), as well as complications suffered (bacterial infection, pneumonia, and neurological and other complications).
The following were calculated for both varicella and herpes zoster: cumulative weekly incidences for the overall study period; and, crude and standardised incidence rates for the standard European population and age-specific rates for each year.
Kendall's Tau-b correlation coefficient was calculated to evaluate whether annual varicella and herpes zoster incidence described a trend over time. Similarly, spectral density in the time series of weekly incidences was estimated, using a periodogram and Tukey-Hamming smoothing.
SPSS® 12.0 statistical package was used.
This study complies with all current international ethic norms.
In the period from 1997 to 2004, a total of 9856 cases of varicella and 1798 cases of herpes zoster were reported to the Madrid Region SGPN.
Varicella case complications detected by the Madrid Region Sentinel General Practitioner Network from 1997 to 2004, by age group.
35 and over
Conjunctivitis and other ophthalmological complications
Percentage of complicated cases of varicella
For varicella, 0.2 % of cases carried no record of patient's gender, and 5.2% had missing values of age. For herpes zoster 0.1% of missing values were founded in patient's gender.
There was no significant shift in trend in annual incidence of varicella in Madrid from 1997 to 2004, despite the fact that the annual rates display rises and falls. As this pattern was almost identically reproduced in children aged under 5 years, among whom incidence is highest, the analysis was not repeated for that age group. An important seasonality factor was in evidence, with peaks in incidence from May to July, and lows towards October. Distribution by gender showed no differences. These results are similar to others obtained in other countries [15–17].
Few complications were observed, and these mostly consisted of bacterial skin overinfections. Note should however be taken of the fact that the most severe complications were least frequent. Hence, the SGPN may conceivably not detect all complications because it works with a representative sample that covers approximately 2% of the population of Madrid. Moreover, most of complications of varicella receive hospital attention and are not collected by the SGPN.
In contrast to varicella, herpes zoster registered a sustained and significant rise in annual incidence, particularly among the oldest age groups, though there was no evidence of seasonality. Again unlike varicella, and as described elsewhere, there was a higher percentage of cases among females than males[2, 19].
Starting from data as presented in this work, further studies are called for to evaluate the vaccine, its effectiveness and the duration of immunity.
The number of Sentinel Networks has grown worldwide since the 1960's and they are used in fields as diverse as communicable [28–30] and non-communicable disease surveillance[31, 32]. In Madrid, SGPN has demonstrated to be an efficient and useful system for the epidemiologic surveillance of several diseases, and especially for varicella and herpes zoster.
In recent years, the time trend in respect of varicella incidence among subjects who were not covered by universal varicella vaccination has remained stable. Although the percentage of complications is not high, these are nevertheless more frequent among adults. Incidence of herpes zoster maintained a rising trend over the study period.
Sentinel general practitioner networks are useful instruments for epidemiological surveillance of diseases such as varicella and herpes zoster.
The authors thank General Practitioners and Paediatricians who have collaborated with the Madrid Sentinel Practice Network.
- Whitley RJ: Varicella-Zoster Virus. Principles & Practice of Infectious Diseases. Edited by: Mandell GL, Bennett JE and Dolin R. 2000, Philadelphia, Churchill Livingstone, 126: 1053-1062. 5Google Scholar
- Thomas SL, Hall AJ: What does epidemiology tell us about risk factors for herpes zoster?. Lancet Infect Dis. 2004, 4: 26-33. 10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00857-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brisson M, Edmunds WJ, Law B, Gay NJ, Walld R, Brownell M, Roos L, De Serres G: Epidemiology of varicella zoster virus infection in Canada and the United Kingdom. Epidemiol Infect. 2001, 127: 305-314.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Cortes M, Pereira J, Pena-Rey I, Genova R, Amela C: Carga de enfermedad atribuible a las afecciones inmunoprevenibles en la población infantojuvenil española. Gac Sanit. 2004, 18: 312-320. 10.1157/13067392.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Asano Y: Varicella vaccine: the Japanese experience. J Infect Dis. 1996, 174 Suppl 3: S310-S313.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- American Academy of Pediatrics CID: Live attenuated varicella vaccine. Pediatrics. 1995, 95: 791-796.Google Scholar
- Comité Asesor en Vacunas de la Asociación Española de Pediatría: Calendario de vacunación de la Asociación Española de Pediatría 1999. An Esp Pediatr. 1999, 51: 120-126.Google Scholar
- Consumo CS: Orden 1869/2006 por la que se actualiza el calendario de vacunaciones sistemáticas infantiles de la Comunidad de Madrid. Boletín Oficial de la Comunidad de Madrid. 2006, Nº 253: 5-6.Google Scholar
- Vazquez M, LaRussa PS, Gershon AA, Steinberg SP, Freudigman K, Shapiro ED: The effectiveness of the varicella vaccine in clinical practice. N Engl J Med. 2001, 344: 955-960. 10.1056/NEJM200103293441302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vazquez M, LaRussa PS, Gershon AA, Niccolai LM, Muehlenbein CE, Steinberg SP, Shapiro ED: Effectiveness over time of varicella vaccine. JAMA. 2004, 291: 851-855. 10.1001/jama.291.7.851.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lopez AS, Guris D, Zimmerman L, Gladden L, Moore T, Haselow DT, Loparev VN, Schmid DS, Jumaan AO, Snow SL: One dose of varicella vaccine does not prevent school outbreaks: is it time for a second dose?. Pediatrics. 2006, 117: e1070-e1077. 10.1542/peds.2005-2085.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arvin A, Gershon A: Control of varicella: why is a two-dose schedule necessary?. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006, 25: 475-476. 10.1097/01.inf.0000219484.55858.a2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Welsby PD: Chickenpox, chickenpox vaccination, and shingles. Postgrad Med J. 2006, 82: 351-352. 10.1136/pgmj.2005.038984.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Oxman MN, Levin MJ, Johnson GR, Schmader KE, Straus SE, Gelb LD, Arbeit RD, Simberkoff MS, Gershon AA, Davis LE, Weinberg A, Boardman KD, Williams HM, Zhang JH, Peduzzi PN, Beisel CE, Morrison VA, Guatelli JC, Brooks PA, Kauffman CA, Pachucki CT, Neuzil KM, Betts RF, Wright PF, Griffin MR, Brunell P, Soto NE, Marques AR, Keay SK, Goodman RP, Cotton DJ, Gnann JW, Loutit J, Holodniy M, Keitel WA, Crawford GE, Yeh SS, Lobo Z, Toney JF, Greenberg RN, Keller PM, Harbecke R, Hayward AR, Irwin MR, Kyriakides TC, Chan CY, Chan IS, Wang WW, Annunziato PW, Silber JL: A vaccine to prevent herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia in older adults. N Engl J Med. 2005, 352: 2271-2284. 10.1056/NEJMoa051016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deguen S, Chau NP, Flahault A: Epidemiology of chickenpox in France (1991-1995). J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998, 52 Suppl 1: 46S-49S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arama V, Rafila A, Streinu-Cercel A, Pistol A, Bacruban R, Sandu R, Pitigoi D, Negoita A: Varicella in Romania: epidemiological trends, 1986-2004. Euro Surveill. 2005, 10: E050811-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brisson M, Edmunds WJ: Epidemiology of Varicella-Zoster Virus in England and Wales. J Med Virol. 2003, 70 Suppl 1: S9-14. 10.1002/jmv.10313.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gil A, San Martin M, Carrasco P, Gonzalez A: Epidemiology of severe varicella-zoster virus infection in Spain. Vaccine. 2004, 22: 3947-3951. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.04.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mullooly JP, Riedlinger K, Chun C, Weinmann S, Houston H: Incidence of herpes zoster, 1997-2002. Epidemiol Infect. 2005, 133: 245-253. 10.1017/S095026880400281X.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Edmunds WJ, Brisson M: The effect of vaccination on the epidemiology of varicella zoster virus. J Infect. 2002, 44: 211-219. 10.1053/jinf.2002.0988.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hambleton S: Chickenpox. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2005, 18: 235-240. 10.1097/01.qco.0000168384.31766.89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brisson M, Gay NJ, Edmunds WJ, Andrews NJ: Exposure to varicella boosts immunity to herpes-zoster: implications for mass vaccination against chickenpox. Vaccine. 2002, 20: 2500-2507. 10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00180-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gil A, Gonzalez A, Oyaguez I, Martin MS, Carrasco P: The burden of severe varicella in Spain, 1995--2000 period. Eur J Epidemiol. 2004, 19: 699-702. 10.1023/B:EJEP.0000036791.43264.84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Edmunds WJ, Brisson M, Rose JD: The epidemiology of herpes zoster and potential cost-effectiveness of vaccination in England and Wales. Vaccine. 2001, 19: 3076-3090. 10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00044-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brisson M, Edmunds WJ: Varicella vaccination in England and Wales: cost-utility analysis. Arch Dis Child. 2003, 88: 862-869. 10.1136/adc.88.10.862.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Peña-Rey I, Perez-Farinos N, Cortes-Garcia M, Amela-Heras C: Coste-efectividad de la vacunación contra la varicela en adolescentes en España. Gac Sanit. 2004, 18: 287-294.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thiry N, Beutels P, Tancredi F, Romano L, Zanetti A, Bonanni P, Gabutti G, Van Damme P: An economic evaluation of varicella vaccination in Italian adolescents. Vaccine. 2004, 22: 3546-3562. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.03.043.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ciofi Degli Atti ML, Salmaso S, Bella A, Arigliani R, Gangemi M, Chiamenti G, Brusoni G, Tozzi AE: Pediatric sentinel surveillance of vaccine-preventable diseases in Italy. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2002, 21: 763-768. 10.1097/00006454-200208000-00013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dedman DJ, Zambon M, Buynder PV, Fleming DM, Watson JM, Joseph CA: Influenza surveillance in England and Wales: October 1997 to June 1998. Commun Dis Public Health. 1998, 1: 244-251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ordobas MA, Zorrilla B, Arias P: Influenza in Madrid, Spain, 1991-92: validity of the sentinel network. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995, 49 Suppl 1: 14-16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fleming DM, Schellevis FG, Van Casteren V: The prevalence of known diabetes in eight European countries. Eur J Public Health. 2004, 14: 10-14. 10.1093/eurpub/14.1.10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Le Pont F, Letrilliart L, Massari V, Dorleans Y, Thomas G, Flahault A: Suicide and attempted suicide in France: results of a general practice sentinel network, 1999-2001. Br J Gen Pract. 2004, 54: 282-284.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/7/59/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.