You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A sensitive flow cytometric methodology for studying the binding of L. chagasi to canine peritoneal macrophages

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
31 Aug 2004 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Oct 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jacques Mauel
8 Nov 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aiyappa Palecanda
9 Nov 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - José-Enrique O'Connor
17 Nov 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emanuela Handman
18 Feb 2005 Author responded Author comments - Wagner Tafuri
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Feb 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Mar 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emanuela Handman
14 Mar 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aiyappa Palecanda
17 Mar 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - José-Enrique O'Connor
8 Apr 2005 Author responded Author comments - Wagner Tafuri
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Apr 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 May 2005 Author responded Author comments - Wagner Tafuri
Resubmission - Version 5
4 May 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
24 May 2005 Editorially accepted
24 May 2005 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-5-39

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement