You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Incorrect identification of recent Asian strains of Coxsackievirus A16 as human enterovirus 71: Improved primers for the specific detection of human enterovirus 71 by RT PCR

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Feb 2004 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Feb 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bart Rombaut
6 Mar 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hiroyuki Shimizu
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Apr 2004 Author responded Author comments - Jane Cardosa
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Apr 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Apr 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hiroyuki Shimizu
24 Apr 2004 Author responded Author comments - Jane Cardosa
Resubmission - Version 4
24 Apr 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
4 May 2004 Editorially accepted
4 May 2004 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-4-11

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement