- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Clustering of Beijing genotype Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from the Mekong delta in Vietnam on the basis of variable number of tandem repeat versus restriction fragment length polymorphism typing
- Mai NT Huyen†1Email author,
- Kristin Kremer†2, 3,
- Nguyen TN Lan†1,
- Tran N Buu†1,
- Frank GJ Cobelens†4,
- Edine W Tiemersma†4, 5,
- Petra de Haas†3 and
- Dick van Soolingen†3, 6
© Huyen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
- Received: 23 July 2012
- Accepted: 29 January 2013
- Published: 2 February 2013
In comparison to restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) typing, variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) typing is easier to perform, faster and yields results in a simple, numerical format. Therefore, this technique has gained recognition as the new international gold standard in typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. However, some reports indicated that VNTR typing may be less suitable for Beijing genotype isolates. We therefore compared the performance of internationally standardized RFLP and 24 loci VNTR typing to discriminate among 100 Beijing genotype isolates from the Southern Vietnam.
Hundred Beijing genotype strains defined by spoligotyping were randomly selected and typed by RFLP and VNTR typing. The discriminatory power of VNTR and RFLP typing was compared using the Bionumerics software.
Among 95 Beijing strains available for analysis, 14 clusters were identified comprising 34 strains and 61 unique profiles in 24 loci VNTR typing ((Hunter Gaston Discrimination Index (HGDI = 0.994)). 13 clusters containing 31 strains and 64 unique patterns in RFLP typing (HGDI = 0.994) were found. Nine RFLP clusters were subdivided by VNTR typing and 12 VNTR clusters were split by RFLP. Five isolates (5%) revealing double alleles or no signal in two or more loci in VNTR typing could not be analyzed.
Overall, 24 loci VNTR typing and RFLP typing had similar high-level of discrimination among 95 Beijing strains from Southern Vietnam. However, loci VNTR 154, VNTR 2461 and VNTR 3171 had hardly added any value to the level of discrimination.
- Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism
- Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Pattern
- Beijing Strain
- Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Typing
- Beijing Genotype
The IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) typing was previously considered the gold standard in the molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis . Although this typing technique generally revealed a high level of discrimination among Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates, it was considered complicated, technically demanding, and time consuming. In addition, a part of the strains contained too few copies of IS6110 to enable a reliable typing. Variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) typing is easier and faster to perform, and yields results in a numerical format. Therefore, this technique has become the new international typing method for M. tuberculosis since 2006 . Several studies indicated that VNTR typing is as discriminative as RFLP typing and more suitable to type strains with few copies of IS6110[3, 4]. However, doubt remained whether VNTR typing is as good as RFLP typing in discriminating Beijing genotype strains. As in Vietnam about 40% of the M. tuberculosis isolates are of this genotype, we in this study compared the performance of RFLP and internationally standardized 24 loci VNTR typing to discriminate among one hundred Beijing genotype isolates from the South of Vietnam.
In total 100 M. tuberculosis isolates of the Beijing genotype family were selected from a previous study on the dynamics of tuberculosis transmission in Vietnam. The study area consisted of three adjacent rural districts in Tiengiang Province, in the Mekong River Delta in Southern Vietnam. All patients were aged ≥15 years, resident in the study area and registered for treatment of smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) between 1 January 2003 and 28 June 2007 at the participating District Tuberculosis Units, or at the provincial TB hospital and were eligible for inclusion into the study. Each eligible patient submitted two sputum samples for TB culture, drug susceptibility testing and genotyping and completed an interview form. The details of this study have been published previously .
Ethical clearance was obtained from the ethical health committee of the Ho Chi Minh City Council (reference number 1106/UBND-VX). All included patients provided written informed consent.
Sputum specimens were kept refrigerated and transported to Pham Ngoc Thach Hospital in Ho Chi Minh City within 72 hrs after collection. They were decontaminated and liquefied using 1% N-acetylcysteine/2% NaOH, inoculated on modified Ogawa medium and incubated at 37°C. Cultures were examined for growth after 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks of incubation. Cultures with no growth after 8 weeks were considered negative. M. tuberculosis was identified using the niacin and the nitrate tests .
Genomic DNA was extracted from positive cultures using an earlier described method . IS6110 RFLP typing and spoligotyping were performed according to the internationally standardized methods [1, 8]. The VNTR typing was executed on the basis of 15 loci and 24 loci as described by Supply et al. .
Random selection of one hundred Beijing genotype strains
Among 1,797 M. tuberculosis isolates that were successfully typed in RFLP and spoligotyping, 819 strains represented the Beijing genotype according to spoligo typing patterns. After the isolate numbers had been sorted in numerical order, every 8th Beijing genotype was selected until a total of 100 isolates was reached.
Gene Marker software, version 1.5 (Softgenetics, PA, USA) was used for analysis and automated allele calling of the VNTR patterns. The Bionumerics software, version 3.0 (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens Latem, Belgium) was used for the analysis and comparison of IS6110 RFLP and VNTR typing patterns.
where n is the total number of strains in the sample population, s is the total number of types described, and nj is the number of strains belonging to the jth type. This equation is derived as follows: the probability that a single strain sampled at random will belong to the jth group is nj/ n and the probability that two strains sampled consecutively will belong to that group is nj(nj - 1)/ n(n - 1).
Beijing lineage (genotype) strains were defined as strains having at least three of the nine spacers 35 to 43 and lacking spacers 1–34 based on the 43 spacer spoligo patterns [8, 10]. If a strain missed all spacers 1–34 and also one or a few of the spacers 35–43, the Beijing strains was considered to represent the Atypical branch of the Beijing genotype lineage .
Two strains were defined as a cluster if they had identical RFLP patterns or identical VNTR profiles (Bionumerics), or if VNTR types differed by no more than a single locus .
In the period January 2003 to June 2007, a total of 2,664 M. tuberculosis strains were isolated from eligible patients, of which 1,795 were successfully typed in RFLP and spoligo typing. Of these, 819 (45.6%) were of the Beijing genotype based on the spoligo patterns; the remaining 976 (54.4%) were of other genotypes. Among the 819 Beijing genotype strains, 41 (5.0%) most likely belonged to Atypical Beijing lineage, as they missed one or more spacers of the characteristic 9 spacer signature.
Of the 819 Beijing strains, 353 (43.1%) were isolated from patients in the Cailay district; 221 strains (27%) isolated from patients in the Caibe district, and the remaining 245 strains (29.9%) from patients in the Chauthanh district. Regarding the gender of patients, 592/819 (72.3%) of the strains were isolated from male patients, the remaining 227 (27.7%) from females.
From these 819 Beijing genotype strains, 100 strains were randomly selected as described above, of which 5% were most likely Atypical Beijing strains because they missed one or two spacers of the characteristic nine spacer panel 35–43.
Among the 100 selected Beijing genotype strains, 38 (38%) were isolated in the Cailay district, 32 (32%) in the Caibe district and 30 (30%) in the Chauthanh district. The gender distribution was 71% males and 29% female patients. Therefore, the distribution of sex, districts, age (data not shown) in the representative Beijing strains was similar to that in the total collection of 819 Beijing strains (P>0.05).
Hunter Gaston discrimination index (HGDI) values obtained for each locus in the present study compared to two other studies
In the 24 loci VNTR typing of the remaining 95 isolates, 14 clusters of isolates were found; one cluster of four isolates, four clusters of three isolates and nine clusters of two strains. Sixty-one isolates revealed a unique VNTR pattern. The HGDI amounted to 0.994. Twelve of the VNTR clusters were subdivided in RFLP typing.
In RFLP typing, 13 clusters of isolates were found, comprising in total of 31 strains. There were ten clusters of two, two clusters of three and one cluster of five isolates. Sixty-four isolates had a unique RFLP pattern (HGDI = 0.994). Nine RFLP clusters were subdivided in VNTR typing.
From 1993 to 2006, RFLP typing was considered the gold standard in typing of M. tuberculosis isolates, especially for strains harboring multiple IS6110 copies, like the ones of the Beijing genotype family. However, this typing method is technically demanding and time consuming . Furthermore, the discriminatory power of RFLP typing among strains with a low number of IS6110 copies (<= 5 copies) is very poor . Therefore, in recent years VNTR typing has increasingly been explored in the molecular epidemiology worldwide and with the proposal on international standardization of this technique in 2006 it has in fact become the new gold standard . VNTR typing introduced major advantages in typing in comparison to RFLP typing, such as its ease in use, its suitability for standardization, and that the results that are displayed in numbers can be analyzed easily and exchanged efficiently between laboratories. Moreover, the turnaround time of VNTR typing is much shorter than that of RFLP typing, because it is PCR-based and only a little amount of mycobacterial DNA is required.
Many researchers have carried out comparisons between RFLP and 12 or 15 loci VNTR typing methods for discriminating M. tuberculosis isolates [3, 4, 12]. Their findings showed that the discriminative power of 12 loci VNTR was lower than that of 15 loci VNTR (with HGDI of 0.978-0.995)  and 15 loci VNTR has high level of discrimination with HGDI 0.990-0.995 [4, 12], but this was still lower than that of RFLP typing (0.998) . However, Supply et al.  proposed to apply 24 instead of 15 loci in VNTR typing, and this improved the level of discrimination significantly.
In our study, we compared the performance of 15 and 24 loci VNTR typing and RFLP typing using 95 Beijing strains and we found that the discrimination index (HGDI) of 15 loci VNTR was the lowest (0.992), followed by both RFLP typing and 24 loci VNTR typing (0.994). However, the differences observed were small. The HGDI of some loci (VNTR 154, VNTR 2461,VNTR 3171) were low in our study, which means that these loci are less useful in discriminating Beijing strains in the South of Vietnam and presumably elsewhere. The HGDI of VNTR 2461, VNTR 577, VNTR 2163b, VNTR 580, VNTR 802, VNTR 960, VNTR 1644 and VNTR 4348, were similar to that observed in a previous study in Hong Kong  (Table 1), whereas the HGDI of VNTR 2996, VNTR 4052, and VNTR 2165 were significantly higher than the ones in that study  (Table 1), for unknown reasons. It may be that because BCG vaccination has been introduced much earlier in Hong Kong than in Vietnam, the ongoing selection of particular strains of the Beijing lineage  may be more advanced in the former than in the latter area and the mentioned loci may have a different level of discriminative power among the circulating strains in both areas.
Our study further found the HGDI of VNTR 1955, 2163b and 2165 to be very high (>0.50) and the best differentiation, similar to two previous studies [4, 12], was obtained with VNTR 2163b (Table 1 and Figure 2).
Some of the HGDI of individual loci in our study were significantly different to the ones found in the study of Alonso et al. (Table 1), because we performed VNTR typing of exclusively Beijing strains, whereas Alonso et al. carried out VNTR typing on a strain collection consisting of 32% LAM, 28% Haarlem and only 2% Beijing strains.
A disadvantage of VNTR typing encountered in this study was that six strains revealed double alleles in a single locus, and two strains even in two and more than two loci. It is not clear whether the latter observation was associated with a mixed infection . However, the revealed genomic instability in particular loci decreases the utility of VNTR typing significantly, as this hampers a reliable interpretation. Also in RFLP typing transposition of IS6110 sometimes interfered with a reliable interpretation, but such a genetic turn-over was observed less frequently . However, we cannot exclude the possibility that these multiple alleles may reflect important phenomena in the epidemiology of TB currently unknown, and these observations, although technically demanding, may be associated with the ongoing adaptation of M. tuberculosis to the current TB control measures.
A major limitation of this study was that we did not have epidemiological information available to verify the transmission links indicated by both typing methods. It was therefore, not possible to ascertain the validity of epidemiological links indicated.
In comparison to 15 loci VNTR, RFLP typing and 24 loci VNTR typing revealed the highest level of discrimination among 95 isolates of the Beijing genotype from Southern Vietnam. For this and other practical reasons, the last method is preferred in investigation on transmission of Beijing strains in Vietnam. This method is in principle also useful in screening for possible mixed infections, after which positive findings (more than two loci with double alleles) would be confirmed with other methods.
This research was funded by the KNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, the Medical Committee Netherlands-Vietnam, the Netherlands.
We thank all TB patients participating in this study and the staff of the National Tuberculosis Program of Tien Giang province for recruiting the patients as well as the staff of the National Tuberculosis Program in PNT hospital for delivering, supervising and checking the data. DaiViet Hoa, Phan Thi Hoang Anh and other staff in Pham Ngoc Thach laboratory are deeply thanked for performing culture, DST and GenoType® MTBDRplus testing. We are grateful to Anne-Marie van den Brandt, Mirjam Dessens, Mimount Enaimi and Arnout Mulder, Jessica de Beer and other staff of the Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory at the National Institute for Public health and the Environment (The Netherlands) for providing us the knowledge and practice on the molecular techniques used in this study.
- van Embden JD, Cave MD, Crawford JT, Dale JW, Eisenach KD, Gicquel B, Hermans P, Martin C, McAdam R, Shinnick TM, et al: Strain identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA fingerprinting: recommendations for a standardized methodology. J Clin Microbiol. 1993, 31: 406-409.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Supply P, Allix C, Lesjean S, Cardoso-Oelemann M, Rusch-Gerdes S, Willery E, Savine E, de Haas P, van Deutekom H, Roring S, et al: Proposal for standardization of optimized mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable-number tandem repeat typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2006, 44: 4498-4510. 10.1128/JCM.01392-06.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Smittipat N, Billamas P, Palittapongarnpim M, Thong-On A, Temu MM, Thanakijcharoen P, Karnkawinpong O, Palittapongarnpim P: Polymorphism of variable-number tandem repeats at multiple loci in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 5034-5043. 10.1128/JCM.43.10.5034-5043.2005.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kremer K, Au BK, Yip PC, Skuce R, Supply P, Kam KM, van Soolingen D: Use of variable-number tandem-repeat typing to differentiate Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing family isolates from Hong Kong and comparison with IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism typing and spoligotyping. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 314-320. 10.1128/JCM.43.1.314-320.2005.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Buu TN, Huyen MN, Lan NT, Quy HT, Hen NV, Zignol M, Borgdorff MW, Cobelens FG, van Soolingen D: The Beijing genotype is associated with young age and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in rural Vietnam. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009, 13: 900-906.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease: Technical guide-sputum examination for tuberculosis direct microscopy in low-income countries. In The Union. 2000, Paris, France, 5Google Scholar
- Van Soolingen D, de Haas PEW, Kremer K: Restriction fragment length polymorphism typing of mycobacteria. Mycobacterium tuberculosis protocols. Edited by: Parish T, Stoker NG. 2001, Totowa, New Jersey, USA: Humana Press Inc, 165-203.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kamerbeek J, Schouls L, Kolk A, van Agterveld M, van Soolingen D, Kuijper S, Bunschoten A, Molhuizen H, Shaw R, Goyal M, et al: Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology. J Clin Microbiol. 1997, 35: 907-914.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hunter PR, Gaston MA: Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson’s index of diversity. J Clin Microbiol. 1988, 26: 2465-2466.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kremer K, Glynn JR, Lillebaek T, Niemann S, Kurepina NE, Kreiswirth BN, Bifani PJ, van Soolingen D: Definition of the Beijing/W lineage of Mycobacterium tuberculosis on the basis of genetic markers. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 4040-4049. 10.1128/JCM.42.9.4040-4049.2004.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kremer K, Van der Werf MJ, Au BK, Anh DD, Kam KM, Van Doorn HR, Borgdorff MW, Van Soolingen D: Vaccine-induced immunity circumvented by typical Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing strains. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009, 15: 335-339. 10.3201/eid1502.080795.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Alonso Rodriguez N, Martinez Lirola M, Herranz M, Sanchez Benitez M, Barroso P, Bouza E, Garcia De Viedma D: Evaluation of the new advanced 15-loci MIRU-VNTR genotyping tool in Mycobacterium tuberculosis molecular epidemiology studies. BMC Microbiol. 2008, 8: 34-10.1186/1471-2180-8-34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Shamputa IC, Jugheli L, Sadradze N, Willery E, Portaels F, Supply P, Rigouts L: Mixed infection and clonal representativeness of a single sputum sample in tuberculosis patients from a penitentiary hospital in Georgia. Respir Res. 2006, 7: 99-10.1186/1465-9921-7-99.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- de Boer AS, Borgdorff MW, de Haas PE, Nagelkerke NJ, van Embden JD, van Soolingen D: Analysis of rate of change of IS6110 RFLP patterns of Mycobacterium tuberculosis based on serial patient isolates. J Infect Dis. 1999, 180: 1238-1244. 10.1086/314979.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/13/63/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.