Using sequence data to identify alternative routes and risk of infection: a case-study of campylobacter in Scotland
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|29 Aug 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nigel French|
|10 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marja-Liisa Hänninen|
|31 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jonas Waldenström|
|19 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Paul Bessell|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|19 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Apr 2012||Editorially accepted|
|1 Apr 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2334-12-80|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.