You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Marked variation in MSP-1 19 antibody responses to malaria in western Kenyan highlands

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Sep 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert William Snow
7 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Teun Bousema
11 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - George Ayodo
14 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Franck Remoue
31 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Kingsley Badu
Resubmission - Version 2
31 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Franck Remoue
16 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Teun Bousema
16 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - George Ayodo
18 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert William Snow
31 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Kingsley Badu
Resubmission - Version 3
31 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
1 Mar 2012 Editorially accepted
1 Mar 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-12-50

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement