- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Measurement of the plasma levels of antibodies against the polymorphic vaccine candidate apical membrane antigen 1 in a malaria-exposed population
© Kusi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
- Received: 18 October 2011
- Accepted: 2 February 2012
- Published: 2 February 2012
Establishing antibody correlates of protection against malaria in human field studies and clinical trials requires, amongst others, an accurate estimation of antibody levels. For polymorphic antigens such as apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1), this may be confounded by the occurrence of a large number of allelic variants in nature.
To test this hypothesis, plasma antibody levels in an age-stratified cohort of naturally exposed children from a malaria-endemic area in Southern Ghana were determined by indirect ELISA. Titres against four single PfAMA1 alleles were compared with those against three different allele mixtures presumed to have a wider repertoire of epitope specificities. Associations of antibody levels with the incidence of clinical malaria as well as with previous exposure to parasites were also examined.
Antibody titres against PfAMA1 alleles generally increased with age/exposure while antibody specificity for PfAMA1 variants decreased, implying that younger children (≤ 5 years) elicit a more strain-specific antibody response compared to older children. Antibody titre measurements against the FVO and 3D7 AMA1 alleles gave the best titre estimates as these varied least in pair-wise comparisons with titres against all PfAMA1 allele mixtures. There was no association between antibody levels against any capture antigen and either clinical malaria incidence or parasite density.
The current data shows that levels of naturally acquired antigen-specific antibodies, especially in infants and young children, are dependent on the antigenic allele used for measurement. This may be relevant to the interpretation of antibody titre data from measurements against single PfAMA1 alleles, especially in studies involving infants and young children who have experienced fewer infections.
- Antibody Level
- Parasite Density
- Clinical Malaria
- Parasite Strain
Antibodies have a demonstrably crucial role in protection against clinical malaria and the measurement of malaria-specific antibodies and their correlation with protection against disease/infection is essential in field as well as vaccine trial studies. Anti-malarial antibodies participate in such effector mechanisms as complement-mediated parasite clearance, red cell invasion inhibition, direct neutralization of parasites/toxins and antibody-mediated cellular inhibition/cytotoxicity [1–5].
Antibodies are naturally induced against a host of parasite antigens, and in vivo protection may generally be based on the cumulative/synergistic effect of relevant responses rather than responses to any single antigen. Additionally, at the peak of an infection, high levels of the relevant antibodies, rather than their generation from memory may be necessary for protection [6, 7]. The precise determination of anti-malarial antibody levels in field and vaccine studies in disease-endemic areas is therefore very crucial to data interpretation as well as for identifying antigen correlates of protection. Association of antibody levels with clinical protection from malaria may be complicated by the effects of previous antigen exposure and by the fact that some induced antibodies are mere surrogates of an induced response with no protective value [8, 9].
For polymorphic parasite antigens, antibodies against one allelic form have been shown to react less with other alleles as a significant proportion of antibodies are directed against strain-specific epitopes, and this represents yet another limitation in antibody titre estimation. Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen 1 (PfAMA1), a type 1 integral membrane protein expressed in the merozoite and sporozoite stages of the parasite and a leading candidate for the development of a blood stage vaccine is one such antigen [10–17]. Polymorphism in PfAMA1 is due to a number of non-random point mutations that occur in the antigen's ectodomain, an effect that has been associated with host immune pressure on the parasite [18, 19]. Thus for a highly polymorphic antigen like apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1), many variants of which are likely to be present in a single population, estimation of the true antibody levels can be challenging as antibody levels measured against any single PfAMA1 allele may underestimate the true levels of persisting antibodies. This hypothesis was tested by comparing the anti-PfAMA1 antibody levels in plasma samples collected prior to the low transmission season in a naturally exposed population against four single PfAMA1 alleles and three different PfAMA1 allele mixtures. The antigen mixtures are expected to have a variety of unique epitopes that would enhance binding of the broad spectrum of polyclonal anti-AMA1 antibodies in naturally exposed individuals. The study further assesses the association of antibody levels with the incidence of clinical malaria during the low transmission season as well as with previous exposure to parasites.
The current study used archived human samples from a longitudinal cohort study conducted during the malaria seasons of 1994 and 1995. The original study was approved by the Ministry of Health in Ghana and ethical clearance was sought from the ethics committee of the Ministry of Health. Written informed consent was obtained from parents of participating children for the original study, but sample analyses in the current study were done anonymously.
Study population and sampling
A random sample of 95 archived plasma samples drawn from the previous longitudinal cohort study (conducted at Dodowa, an area in Southern Ghana with seasonal transmission of mainly P. falciparum) was used in this study. A detailed description of the study site and sampling procedures has previously been published [20, 21]. Malaria transmission in the study area was perennial, but was highest during the rainy season (May - November) and lowest during the dry season (December - April). The original study involved a total of 300 children between the ages of 3 and 15 years. Participants were actively followed up every week for the entire duration of the study (16 months) and clinical and parasitological data were collected at each visit. Blood samples were drawn from study participants at the beginning of the high transmission season (April 1994) as well as at the end of the season, prior to the beginning of the low transmission season (November 1994). Plasma samples used here were prepared from blood samples taken before the low transmission season in November 1994. Clinical malaria was defined as having a fever and/or an axillary temperature above 37.5°C, as well as parasitaemia above 5000 parasites/μl of blood.
Anti-PfAMA1 antibodies titres in plasma samples were measured using an antigen capture ELISA. Plates were coated separately with 1 μg/ml of AMA1 alleles from the FVO (GenBank accession number AJ277646), HB3 (GenBank accession number U33277), 3D7 (GenBank accession number U65407) and CAMP (GenBank accession number M58545) parasite strains, as well as with 1 μg/ml of three different antigen mixtures; i) a mixture of three Diversity covering (DiCo) antigens whose design is based on the amino acid sequences of 355 naturally occurring PfAMA1 alleles , ii) a mixture of the FVO, HB3, 3D7 and CAMP alleles, designated as Four, and iii) a mixture of all seven allelic antigens, designated as Seven. All antigen mixtures had equal microgram (μg) quantities of the component PfAMA1 alleles. All antigens were expressed in Pichia pastoris and potential N-Glycosylation sites were removed by methodologies that have been previously described [14, 22–24]. Plates were blocked with 200 μl/well of 3% BSA in PBS-Tween 20 (0.05%) for 1 h, after which 100 μl/well of plasma (diluted 1: 200 and titrated 3-fold over 8 duplicate wells) was added and incubated for 1 h. Bound antibodies were detected by incubation with 100 μl/well of 0.8 μg/ml alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-human IgG for 1 h. Colour development was with 1 mg/ml p-Nitrophenyl phosphate in DEA buffer (0.15% MgCl2.6H2O, 0.01% diethanolamine, pH = 9.8) for 30 min and optical density (OD) was measured at 405 nm. ODs were subsequently expressed in arbitrary units (AU) by the calibrator (hyperimmune human serum pool) included on each ELISA plate using the 4PL-based ADAMSEL programme (Remarque®), a data management system that is accessible from the EMVDA website http://www.malariaresearch.eu. One arbitrary unit (1 AU) is equivalent to the reciprocal plasma dilution that gives an OD of 1.0 over background.
Antibody titres were log-transformed to achieve normality and stratified by age (3 to 5 years, 6 to 10 years and 11 to 15 years) in order to assess the effect of age/antigen exposure on the specificity of elicited antibodies. Antibody titres were compared for the same age group across capture antigens by one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey Honest Significance Difference post hoc tests where necessary. The student t test was used to make pair-wise comparisons between titres of different age groups measured against the same capture antigen. Titres are also presented as boxplots per age group on each capture antigen. For each capture antigen, antibody titre variability amongst the different age groups was assessed by Levene's test for homogeneity of variances. The log-transformed titres against different capture antigen pairs were subsequently compared using Tukey mean-difference (TMD) or Bland-Altman plots , which assess the degree of agreement between same sample measurements by different methods (here different capture antigens). Since titres were log-transformed, the x-axis gives the geometric mean of the two antibody measurements for the sample against the capture antigen pair and the y-axis gives the ratio of titre measurements. Plots show a bold horizontal line (line of equality) indicating the geometric mean of titre differences (ideally at titre ratio = 1 or titre difference = 0) between the antigen pair and dotted lines indicate the 95% limits of agreement for the paired data distribution. The vertical axis has been modified to show fold difference instead of the absolute titre difference. Similar recognition of antibodies from the same individual by two different PfAMA1 alleles would suggest a difference of zero (0) or a log (difference) of one (1). Thus the more distant data points are from the line of equality, the greater the binding preference of the same antibodies for one allele over the other.
Association between antibody levels against each of the capture antigens and cumulative incidence of clinical malaria (with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Clinical malaria incidence rate estimation included all malaria episodes that met the case definition. Data from all 95 children sampled for this study were included in the analyses. Three parasite density categories (designated "1 < 760", "760 < 3000" and "3000+") were created based on cut-offs that ensured an equal distribution of samples, and these were compared with the non-parasitaemic group (designated "None"). The association between antibody levels (and age group) with previous exposure to infection (defined as categorical variables) were assessed separately for titres against each capture antigen using a linear regression model. For each antigen, Cox regression with a robust standard error was used to estimate the rate ratio and its 95% confidence interval. The exposure of interest, antibody levels, was modeled as a continuous variable transformed to log base 2 so that rate ratios indicate the decrease in incidence rate of malaria corresponding to a two-fold increase in antibody levels.
Analyses and plots were made using the R statistical package (version 2.13.0, 2011, R development core team) and STATA package (Statacorp, College Station, TX).
Number of PfAMA1 alleles with similar amino acid sequences to alleles used in this study.
*Number of sequences
Characteristics of study population
Number of children (%)
Cumulative incidence (95%CI)
Child-months at risk
Rate per 100 child-months (95% CI)
3 - 5 years
20.1% (10, 38.1)
3.5 (1.9, 6.2)
6 - 10 years
22.4% (10.7, 43.2)
3.1 (1.5, 6.5)
11 - 15 years
17.6% (7.7, 37.3)
2.1 (0.9, 4.9)
19.8% (13, 29.7)
2.9 (1.9, 4.4)
Age-adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) for the association of anti-parasite antibody levels with malaria incidence
Crude HR (95%CI)
HR adjusted for age (95%CI)
P-value for adjusted HR
1.06 (0.92, 1.22)
1.05 (0.92, 1.19)
1.08 (0.94, 1.24)
1.05 (0.92, 1.21)
1.08 (0.93, 1.26)
1.07 (0.93, 1.23)
1.09 (0.94, 1.27)
1.06 (0.92, 1.21)
1.08 (0.93, 1.26)
1.08 (0.94, 1.24)
1.11 (0.95, 1.30)
1.04 (0.91, 1.18)
An accurate estimation of antibody levels against malaria parasite antigens is necessary for establishing antibody correlates of protection against malaria in human field studies and clinical trials. A number of parasite antigens that are currently being assessed as vaccine candidates show polymorphism, and the estimation of antibody titres using a single allelic form may be confounded by the occurrence of a large number of allelic variants in nature.
In this study, the effect of antigenic polymorphism on the measured levels of anti-PfAMA1 antibodies was assessed by comparing titres against single PfAMA1 alleles and allele mixtures in plasma samples taken before the low malaria transmission season in a previous study. The PfAMA1 allele mixtures are expected to present a broad spectrum of antigenic epitopes that will be recognised by antibodies in the polyclonal pool. We also investigated the association of anti-PfAMA1 antibody levels with the cumulative incidence of clinical malaria as well as with previous exposure to parasites.
For participants in any one age group, antibody levels against the different capture antigens/mixtures did not differ significantly. This observation is not surprising as antibodies in the plasma samples from most study participants were most likely induced after repeated infection with diverse parasite strains over time. Several studies have indeed reported a large diversity of parasite strains within single communities in disease-endemic areas [19, 26–28]. Genotyping of parasite strains in study participants here would have added to data interpretation, but this could not be done due to the unavailability of matching DNA samples.
The greater variability of antibody titres (against all but the antigen mixtures Four and Seven) observed in younger children (Figures 1 and 2) suggests that individuals with fewer parasite exposures might have a greater proportion of strain-specific antibodies compared to individuals who have had many parasite infections. It is therefore possible that the use of a single allele for antibody measurement, especially in infants/young children or individuals with limited parasite exposure, may under-estimate antibody levels and such data need to be interpreted cautiously.
The data here also suggest that though humans discriminate between PfAMA1 alleles and possibly other polymorphic parasite antigens, these effects may become less apparent with age and exposure to variant parasite strains. This observation is in agreement with previous observations in humans . In a study involving participants from Papua New Guinea for example, Cortes et al.  showed that the majority of anti-PfAMA1 antibodies directed against polymorphic epitopes were detected in younger age groups compared to older individuals. The development of a more cross-reactive profile with age/exposure may most likely be as a result of clonal imprinting, with antigens derived from every infection primarily boosting memory to previously encountered antigenic epitopes. This phenomenon has been demonstrated in a controlled setting in rabbits after immunisation with different PfAMA1 alleles in sequence .
Antibody measurement against a PfAMA1 allele mixture is expected to give the best titre estimate of polyclonal anti-PfAMA1 antibodies in the field since the mixture would have a large diversity of antigenic epitopes. Such an approach based on a practical number of alleles may be useful, especially since there is a high likelihood of many parasite strains occurring in a given community, and even when there are a limited number of strains, their specific AMA1 alleles may not be readily available for use as coating antigens.
Three different allele mixtures were used for titre measurements in this study. DiCo mix (DM), one of the mixtures, consists of three DiCo antigens that were designed based on the sequences of 355 naturally occurring PfAMA1 alleles to inherently cover naturally occurring polymorphism in PfAMA1 . The mixture has been shown in our laboratory to yield higher antibody titres in samples from naturally exposed individuals compared to titres against single natural alleles (unpublished data). Titres against the FVO and 3D7 AMA1 alleles were most comparable to titres against DM and the other two allele mixtures, suggesting that the FVO and 3D7 alleles preferentially recognize a greater number of antibody specificities compared to the CAMP and HB3 alleles. This is against the observation that all four single alleles used in this study have only been found at very low frequencies in the Africa region (Table 1), though the 3D7 allele seems more prevalent compared to the FVO allele. Thus the measured levels of circulating antibodies in a population with multiple strain infections are dependent on the choice of PfAMA1 alleles used for titre measurement.
The low prevalence of all four alleles shows the complexity involved in the measurement and evaluation of responses to PfAMA1 in a naturally exposed population as even in the current study there may still be strain-specific anti-PfAMA1 antibodies that may not be detected by the best single alleles. It is however worth mentioning that the levels of naturally induced cross-reactive antibodies seem to be the repertoire required for cross protection [31–33], and current vaccine strategies aim at inducing such cross-strain antibodies. Antibody measurement against a single allele could therefore give an indication of the levels of cross-strain (protective) antibodies.
There was no association between antibody levels against any of the capture antigens and either the incidence of clinical malaria or previous exposure to parasites before and after correction for age. Antibody levels against PfAMA1 have been associated with a reduced risk of malaria incidence in other studies with comparable population characteristics [34–37]. While the association of antibody levels with clinical protection in these studies was assessed during the high transmission season, association in the current study was assessed during the low transmission season. An earlier study in the same population measured anti-MSP119 antibodies and reported similar levels of antibodies at the beginning and end of the high transmission season . This study also showed no correlation between anti-MSP119 antibodies and protection from disease. These aside, the limited sample size in the current study is also likely to reduce the statistical power required to detect significant associations.
Finally, the in vitro functionality of antibodies could not be assessed as the amount of plasma available was very limited and assays would need to be performed with multiple strains in order to assess the specificity of functional antibodies.
There was a trend of decreasing antibody levels with increasing parasite density from previous exposure, but this inverse association was not statistically significant. This notwithstanding, the observation that 18 of the 23 children who experienced clinical malaria during the study period were in the high parasitaemia group (3000+) suggests that children with moderate to low parasitaemia (below 3000 parasites/μl of blood) were less susceptible to disease. This is in agreement with the observation that maintenance of immune effectors involved in conferring protection against disease requires the persistence of low levels of circulating parasites [29, 38].
The data presented generally suggests a cautious selection of antigens for the measurement of naturally induced antibody levels against polymorphic targets, especially in samples from individuals with limited exposure to parasites. Though the study utilized archived samples taken during the 1994/1995 malaria season, the findings have direct relevance for the assessment of naturally acquired antibodies of broad specificity since titres are measured against randomly selected (allelic) antigens and the exact circulating strains/antigenic alleles within study populations are usually not taken into account. Alternatively, DiCo mix may represent an ideal candidate for the measurement of antibody titres in naturally exposed populations, especially in infants and young children as the three DiCo antigens, apart from the effect of mixing, have been designed to cover polymorphism that is seen in naturally occurring PfAMA1 alleles. The data also points to a trend of increasing proportion of antibodies against cross-strain epitopes with age, and suggest the involvement of clonal imprinting in the development of this antibody repertoire. Finally, though there was no association of antibody levels with either a reduced incidence of clinical malaria or previous exposure to parasites, individuals with moderate parasitaemia (< 3000/μl) had higher absolute antibody levels than those with parasitaemia greater than 3000/μl of blood. These findings are collectively relevant to the interpretation of data on antibodies against polymorphic antigens, especially in field studies involving groups with limited parasite exposure.
We are grateful to the study participants in Dodowa for donating blood samples for analysis. The original study that collected the plasma samples used here was funded by the ENRECA program of the Danish International Development Agency and the Danish Medical Research Council. KAK was also supported by the Ghana Education Trust Fund. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
- Blackman MJ, Scott-Finnigan TJ, Shai S, Holder AA: Antibodies inhibit the protease-mediated processing of a malaria merozoite surface protein. J Exp Med. 1994, 180: 389-393. 10.1084/jem.180.1.389.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deans JA, Alderson T, Thomas AW, Mitchell GH, Lennox ES, Cohen S: Rat monoclonal antibodies which inhibit the in vitr multiplication of Plasmodium knowles. Clin Exp Immunol. 1982, 49: 297-309.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dutta S, Haynes JD, Moch JK, Barbosa A, Lanar DE: Invasion-inhibitory antibodies inhibit proteolytic processing of apical membrane antigen 1 of Plasmodium falciparum merozoites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 12295-12300. 10.1073/pnas.2032858100.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Schofield L, Hewitt MC, Evans K, Siomos MA, Seeberger PH: Synthetic GPI as a candidate anti-toxic vaccine in a model of malaria. Nature. 2002, 418: 785-789. 10.1038/nature00937.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Theisen M, Soe S, Oeuvray C, Thomas AW, Vuust J, Danielsen S, Jepsen S, Druilhe P: The glutamate-rich protein (GLURP) of Plasmodium falciparum is a target for antibody-dependent monocyte-mediated inhibition of parasite growth in vitr. Infect Immun. 1998, 66: 11-17.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lambert PH, Liu M, Siegrist CA: Can successful vaccines teach us how to induce efficient protective immune responses?. Nat Med. 2005, 11: S54-S62. 10.1038/nm1216.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Struik SS, Riley EM: Does malaria suffer from lack of memory?. Immunol Rev. 2004, 201: 268-290. 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00181.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bousema T, Drakeley C, Gesase S, Hashim R, Magesa S, Mosha F, Otieno S, Carneiro I, Cox J, Msuya E, Kleinschmidt I, Maxwell C, Greenwood B, Riley E, Sauerwein R, Chandramohan D, Gosling R: Identification of hot spots of malaria transmission for targeted malaria control. J Infect Dis. 2010, 201: 1764-1774. 10.1086/652456.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Greenhouse B, Ho B, Hubbard A, Njama-Meya D, Narum DL, Lanar DE, Dutta S, Rosenthal PJ, Dorsey G, John CC: Antibodies to Plasmodium falciparum antigens predict a higher risk of malaria but protection from symptoms once parasitemic. J Infect Dis. 2011, 204: 19-26. 10.1093/infdis/jir223.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Crewther PE, Matthew ML, Flegg RH, Anders RF: Protective immune responses to apical membrane antigen 1 of Plasmodium chabaud involve recognition of strain-specific epitopes. Infect Immun. 1996, 64: 3310-3317.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dutta S, Lee SY, Batchelor AH, Lanar DE: Structural basis of antigenic escape of a malaria vaccine candidate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104: 12488-12493. 10.1073/pnas.0701464104.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hodder AN, Crewther PE, Anders RF: Specificity of the protective antibody response to apical membrane antigen 1. Infect Immun. 2001, 69: 3286-3294. 10.1128/IAI.69.5.3286-3294.2001.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kennedy MC, Wang J, Zhang Y, Miles AP, Chitsaz F, Saul A, Long CA, Miller LH, Stowers AW: In vitr studies with recombinant Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1): production and activity of an AMA1 vaccine and generation of a multiallelic response. Infect Immun. 2002, 70: 6948-6960. 10.1128/IAI.70.12.6948-6960.2002.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kusi KA, Faber BW, Thomas AW, Remarque EJ: Humoral immune response to mixed PAMA1 alleles; multivalent PAMA1 vaccines induce broad specificity. PLoS ONE. 2009, 4: e8110-10.1371/journal.pone.0008110.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Silvie O, Franetich JF, Charrin S, Mueller MS, Siau A, Bodescot M, Rubinstein E, Hannoun L, Charoenvit Y, Kocken CH, Thomas AW: Geert-Jan van Gemert GJ, Sauerwein RW, Blackman MJ, Anders RF, Pluschke G, Mazier D: A role for apical membrane antigen 1 during invasion of hepatocytes by Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 9490-9496. 10.1074/jbc.M311331200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stowers AW, Kennedy MC, Keegan BP, Saul A, Long CA, Miller LH: Vaccination of monkeys with recombinant Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen 1 confers protection against blood-stage malaria. Infect Immun. 2002, 70: 6961-6967. 10.1128/IAI.70.12.6961-6967.2002.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Thomas AW, Waters AP, Carr D: Analysis of variation in PF83, an erythrocytic merozoite vaccine candidate antigen of Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1990, 42: 285-287. 10.1016/0166-6851(90)90172-I.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Escalante AA, Lal AA, Ayala FJ: Genetic polymorphism and natural selection in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Genetics. 1998, 149: 189-202.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Polley SD, Chokejindachai W, Conway DJ: Allele frequency-based analyses robustly map sequence sites under balancing selection in a malaria vaccine candidate antigen. Genetics. 2003, 165: 555-561.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dodoo D, Theander TG, Kurtzhals JA, Koram K, Riley E, Akanmori BD, Nkrumah FK, Hviid L: Levels of antibody to conserved parts of Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein 1 in Ghanaian children are not associated with protection from clinical malaria. Infect Immun. 1999, 67: 2131-2137.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dodoo D, Staalsoe T, Giha H, Kurtzhals JA, Akanmori BD, Koram K, Dunyo S, Nkrumah FK, Hviid L, Theander TG: Antibodies to variant antigens on the surfaces of infected erythrocytes are associated with protection from malaria in Ghanaian children. Infect Immun. 2001, 69: 3713-3718. 10.1128/IAI.69.6.3713-3718.2001.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Remarque EJ, Faber BW, Kocken CH, Thomas AW: A diversity-covering approach to immunization with Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen 1 induces broader allelic recognition and growth inhibition responses in rabbits. Infect Immun. 2008, 76: 2660-2670. 10.1128/IAI.00170-08.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Faber BW, Remarque EJ, Kocken CH, Cheront P, Cingolani D, Xhonneux F, Jurado M, Haumont M, Jepsen S, Leroy O, Thomas AW: Production, quality control, stability and pharmacotoxicity of cGMP-produced Plasmodium falciparum AMA1 FVO strain ectodomain expressed in Pichia pastori. Vaccine. 2008, 26: 6143-6150. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.08.055.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kocken CH, Withers-Martinez C, Dubbeld MA, van der WA, Hackett F, Valderrama A, Blackman MJ, Thomas AW: High-level expression of the malaria blood-stage vaccine candidate Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen 1 and induction of antibodies that inhibit erythrocyte invasion. Infect Immun. 2002, 70: 4471-4476. 10.1128/IAI.70.8.4471-4476.2002.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bland JM, Altman DG: Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat. 2007, 17: 571-582. 10.1080/10543400701329422.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Osier FH, Weedall GD, Verra F, Murungi L, Tetteh KK, Bull P, Faber BW, Remarque E, Thomas A, Marsh K, Conway DJ: Allelic diversity and naturally acquired allele-specific antibody responses to Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen 1 in Kenya. Infect Immun. 2010, 78: 4625-4633. 10.1128/IAI.00576-10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Polley SD, Conway DJ: Strong diversifying selection on domains of the Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen 1 gene. Genetics. 2001, 158: 1505-1512.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Takala SL, Coulibaly D, Thera MA, Batchelor AH, Cummings MP, Escalante AA, Ouattara A, Traore K, Niangaly A, Djimde AA, Doumbo OK, Plowe CV: Extreme polymorphism in a vaccine antigen and risk of clinical malaria: implications for vaccine development. Sci Transl Med. 2009, 1: 2-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Doolan DL, Dobano C, Baird JK: Acquired immunity to malaria. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2009, 22: 13-36. 10.1128/CMR.00025-08.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Cortes A, Mellombo M, Masciantonio R, Murphy VJ, Reeder JC, Anders RF: Allele specificity of naturally acquired antibody responses against Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen 1. Infect Immun. 2005, 73: 422-430. 10.1128/IAI.73.1.422-430.2005.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kusi KA, Faber BW, van der EM, Thomas AW, Kocken CH, Remarque EJ: Immunization with different PAMA1 alleles in sequence induces clonal imprint humoral responses that are similar to responses induced by the same alleles as a vaccine cocktail in rabbits. Malar J. 2011, 10: 40-10.1186/1475-2875-10-40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dutta S, Sullivan JS, Grady KK, Haynes JD, Komisar J, Batchelor AH, Soisson L, Diggs CL, Heppner DG, Lanar DE, Collins WE, Barnwell JW: High antibody titer against apical membrane antigen-1 is required to protect against malaria in the Aotu model. PLoS ONE. 2009, 4: e8138-10.1371/journal.pone.0008138.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kusi KA, Faber BW, Riasat V, Thomas AW, Kocken CH, Remarque EJ: Generation of humoral immune responses to multi-allele PAMA1 vaccines; effect of adjuvant and number of component alleles on the breadth of response. PLoS ONE. 2010, 5: e15391-10.1371/journal.pone.0015391.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dodoo D, Aikins A, Kusi KA, Lamptey H, Remarque E, Milligan P, Bosomprah S, Chilengi R, Osei YD, Akanmori BD, Theisen M: Cohort study of the association of antibody levels to AMA1, MSP119, MSP3 and GLURP with protection from clinical malaria in Ghanaian children. Malar J. 2008, 7: 142-10.1186/1475-2875-7-142.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dodoo D, Atuguba F, Bosomprah S, Ansah NA, Ansah P, Lamptey H, Egyir B, Oduro AR, Gyan B, Hodgson A, Koram KA: Antibody levels to multiple malaria vaccine candidate antigens in relation to clinical malaria episodes in children in the Kasena-Nankana district of Northern Ghana. Malar J. 2011, 10: 108-10.1186/1475-2875-10-108.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fowkes FJ, Richards JS, Simpson JA, Beeson JG: The relationship between anti-merozoite antibodies and incidence of Plasmodium falciparum malaria: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2010, 7: e1000218-10.1371/journal.pmed.1000218.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Iriemenam NC, Khirelsied AH, Nasr A, Elghazali G, Giha HA, Elhassan A-E, Agab-Aldour AA, Montgomery SM, Anders RF, Theisen M, Troye-Blomberg M, Elbashir MI, Berzins K: Antibody responses to a panel of Plasmodium falciparum malaria blood-stage antigens in relation to clinical disease outcome in Sudan. Vaccine. 2009, 27: 62-71. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.10.025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gatton ML, Cheng Q: Investigating antigenic variation and other parasite-host interactions in Plasmodium falciparum infections in naive hosts. Parasitology. 2004, 128: 367-376. 10.1017/S0031182003004608.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/12/32/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.