You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Surveillance on secular trends of incidence and mortality for device–associated infection in the intensive care unit setting at a tertiary medical center in Taiwan, 2000–2008: A retrospective observational study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Jan 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alain LEPAPE
16 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - François L'Hériteau
21 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Yin Yin Chen
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alain LEPAPE
25 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - François L'Hériteau
13 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Yin Yin Chen
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - François L'Hériteau
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
31 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Yin Yin Chen
Resubmission - Version 6
31 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 6
31 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Yin Yin Chen
Resubmission - Version 7
31 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
6 Sep 2012 Editorially accepted
10 Sep 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-12-209

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement