You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of three multiplex PCR assays for the detection of respiratory viral infections: evaluation of xTAG respiratory virus panel fast assay, RespiFinder 19 assay and RespiFinder SMART 22 assay

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Sep 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kanti Pabbaraju
30 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Guus Simons
9 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marek Smieja
28 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jens Dreier
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Guus Simons
13 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marek Smieja
3 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jens Dreier
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
18 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marek Smieja
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
28 Jun 2012 Editorially accepted
24 Jul 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-12-163

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement