You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Enhancement of CURB65 score with proadrenomedullin (CURB65-A) for outcome prediction in lower respiratory tract infections: Derivation of a clinical algorithm

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Oct 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Chalmers
28 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - ALBERTO Capelastegui
4 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gavin Barlow
31 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Werner C. Albrich
Resubmission - Version 2
31 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Chalmers
8 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gavin Barlow
5 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Werner C. Albrich
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Werner C. Albrich
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
3 May 2011 Editorially accepted
3 May 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-11-112

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement