You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Microsatellite typing and susceptibilities of serial Cryptococcus neoformans isolates from Cuban patients with recurrent cryptococcal meningitis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 May 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Graeme Meintjes
16 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tihana Bicanic
19 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeremy Day
12 Aug 2010 Author responded Author comments - jf meis
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Aug 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Graeme Meintjes
1 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeremy Day
22 Sep 2010 Author responded Author comments - jf meis
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Sep 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
29 Sep 2010 Author responded Author comments - jf meis
Resubmission - Version 6
29 Sep 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
4 Oct 2010 Editorially accepted
4 Oct 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-10-289

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement