You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Simulated effect of pneumococcal vaccination in the Netherlands on existing rules constructed in a non-vaccinated cohort predicting sequelae after bacterial meningitis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
5 Mar 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephen Leib
22 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - pascal CHAVANET
8 Aug 2010 Author responded Author comments - R.C.J. de Jonge
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Aug 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
1 Sep 2010 Author responded Author comments - R.C.J. de Jonge
Resubmission - Version 5
1 Sep 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
3 Sep 2010 Editorially accepted
3 Sep 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-10-259

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement